论文题目：支架式教学模式在高职英语写作教学中的应用研究
摘要：写作是一种语言输出方式,体现一个人的语言能力与交际能力。因此培养学生写作能力是高等职业英语教学的目标之一。然而,高职院校英语专业写作课堂教学中还存在许多问题有待进一步地改进和完善。因此,探索有效的方法来提高高职学生英语写作自主学习能力是十分迫切的。以建构主义和最近发展区理论为基础,支架式教学通过为学生搭建合理的概念框架,发展学生独立探索知识的能力,实现对所学知识的意义建构。如今有关支架式教学的研究非常普遍,但是关于高职英语写作教学中的实证研究还是比较少。鉴于这一点,本文尝试将支架式教学模式应用于高职英语写作教学中,探讨解决以下两个问题:第一,与传统教学模式相比,支架式教学是否能够提高学生的写作成绩?第二,支架式教学是否能够增强学生的写作自主学习能力?基于上述问题,本文将支架式教学与高职英语写作教学结合起来,旨在探究适合高职英语写作教学的新模式。本实验历时18周,选取142名锦州师范高等专科学校商务英语专业的学生为研究对象。研究对象被随机分为两个班,其中控制班采用传统写作教学方式,而实验班采用支架式教学模式指导英语写作教学。实验前后,分别对学生进行写作测试,通过分析前后测成绩来证明支架教学方法的有效性。为了得到学生对支架式教学的反馈,问卷调查和访谈被用来了解是否支架式教学能提高学生的写作自主学习能力。同时,用SPSS分析测试结果和问卷的数据,并结合分析结果做出详细的讨论。实验结果表明,与传统写作教学相比支架式教学在写作教学中是可行的,有效的。将支架式教学应用到高职英语写作课堂上,可以有效地改善传统课堂的不足,有效的培养学生的写作自主学习能力,提高高职学生的英语写作成绩。
关键词：支架式教学;英语写作教学;自主学习能力
学科专业：课程与教学论
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background of the research
1.2 The present situation in English writing teaching of vocational college
1.3 The purpose and significance of the research
1.4 Organization of this paper
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Writing and related studies on writing teaching
2.2 Scaffolding instruction
2.2.1 Definition of scaffolding instruction
2.2.2 Guiding principles of scaffolding instruction
2.2.3 Procedures and steps of scaffolding instruction
2.2.4 Theoretical framework of scaffolding instruction
2.3 Related studies on scaffolding instruction
2.3.1 Related studies on scaffolding instruction abroad
2.3.2 Related studies on scaffolding instruction at home
Chapter Three Research Methodology
3.1 Research questions
3.2 Participants
3.3 Instruments
3.3.1 Questionnaire
3.3.2 Tests
3.3.3 Interview
3.4 Research procedures
3.5 Teaching procedures
3.5.1 The procedure of writing teaching in Experimental Class
3.5.2 A teaching case of scaffolding instruction on writing
3.5.3 The procedure of writing teaching in Control Class
3.5.4 A teaching case of traditional teaching mode on writing
Chapter Four Data analysis and discussion
4.1 Analysis and discussion of the questionnaire
4.1.1 Analysis of the questionnaire in the EC and the CC before experiment
4.1.2 Analysis of the questionnaire in the EC and the CC after experiment
4.1.3 Discussion of the analysis data in questionnaire
4.2 Analysis and discussion of pre-test and post-test
4.2.1 Analysis of Independent Samples Test for pre-test and post-test
4.2.2 Analysis of Paired Samples Test for pre-test and post-test
4.2.3 Discussion of the analysis data in pre-test and post-test
4.3 Analysis and discussion of the interview
Chapter Five Conclusion
5.1 Major findings
5.2 Implications
5.3 Limitations
5.4 Suggestions for further research
Bibliography
Appendix Ⅰ：Questionnaire
Appendix Ⅱ : Grading criteria
Appendix Ⅲ : Pre-test writing
Appendix Ⅳ: Post-test writing
Appendix Ⅴ: The scores of EC and CC in writing test and questionnaire
Appendix Ⅵ：The example of pigai APP
Appendix Ⅶ: Interview questions
Acknowledgements
The list of the research papers published by the author