GRE阅读搞定长难句只需3个步骤

2024-04-14

GRE阅读搞定长难句只需3个步骤（共2篇）

篇1：GRE阅读搞定长难句只需3个步骤

GRE阅读搞定长难句只需3个步骤分析思路值得一学

新GRE阅读长难句例题

Islamic law is a phenomenon so different from all other forms of law---notwithstanding, of course, a considerable and inevitable number of coincidences with one or the other of them as far as subject matter and positive enactment are concerned---that its study is indispensable in order to appreciate adequately the full range of possible legal phenomena。

新GRE阅读长难句解析

初步读完这句话我们发现这个句子的难句类型是：复杂修饰+插入语+抽象词，其中插入语是理解这个句子的关键。

(1)Islamic law (2)is a (3)phenomenon (4)so different from all other forms of law---notwithstanding, of course,(5)(it has) (6)a considerable and inevitable number of coincidences with one or the other of them /(7)as far as subject matter and positive enactment are concerned/---(8)that its study is indispensable (9)in order to appreciate adequately the full range of possible legal phenomena。

对句子标记后我们可以逐一分析各个成分：

Step1：找主谓

1. 不难发现整个句子的主语就是Islamic law，即伊斯兰法

2. is为整个句子的谓语

3. phenomenon作为整个句子的宾语

从1、2、3我们可以分析出：

1+2+3=句子的主干：伊斯兰的法律是一个法律现象：Islamic law is a phenomenon

Step2：分析句子中的插入语

4. 我们需要注意的是notwithstanding这个词，句子中的插入语之所以比较难懂的主要一个原因在于对notwithstanding的理解，notwithstanding作为介词，相当于in spite of(不管，不顾，尽管)，这对于大多数考生来说是陌生的。

5. 这里加上省略的it has使得句子更加清楚易懂

6. 这一部分是对主语Islamic law的解释说明，即“伊斯兰法与其他的某些法律存在着大量的和必然的一致之处。

7. as far as表示“至于，就.。.而言”

8. 整句话中贯穿了so...that句型

9. in order to appreciate adequately the full range of possible legal phenomena。这句话中包含一个倒装，正常语序的appreciate the full range of possible legal phenomena adequately中的副词adequately被提到appreciate的宾语之前。

Step3：对整句话有个大概的中文翻译的印象

译文：

伊斯兰法是一个与其他所有形式的法律都如此之不同的法律现象---尽管，当然，/从其涉及的内容和实际实施的角度来看/，伊斯兰法与其他的某些法律存在着大量的和必然的一致之处---以至于对于它的研究是不可缺少的，这样才能充分地理解所有可能的法律现象的全部范围。

新GRE阅读长难句结

从分析结果来看插入语的内容对理解文章基本没有什么作用，其实这句话中的插入语根本不用读，也可以根据插入语前后的内容猜出其意思：插入语前后的内容是伊斯兰法与其他法律不同，插入部分以notwithstanding开头，又有of course，可见插入部分一定是让步语气，因此可以对前后的内容取非，猜出插入部分一定是在说伊斯兰法与其他法律有相同之处。所以，如果遇到很长的插入语最好跳过，看懂前后的内容再回头来看插入语。

以上就是通过实例进行的新GRE阅读长难句分析步骤详解,希望大家也能从中学到一些经验和方法，加以运用到平时的练习和考试中，取得满意的成绩。

GRE阅读练习每日一篇

(The article from which the passage was taken appeared in 1982.)

Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satellite formed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantlerocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.

17. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moon

(B) discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moon

(D) argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebula

(E) describe one reason why the Moon’s geochemical makeup should resemble that of the Earth

18. According to the passage, Mars and the Earth are similar in which of the following ways?

I. Their satellites were formed by collisions with other celestial bodies.

II. Their cores contain iron.

III. They were formed from the presolar nebula.

(A) III only

(B) I and II only

(D) II and III only

(E) I, II, and III

19. The author implies that a nearly circular orbit is unlikely for a satellite that

(A) circles one of the inner planets

(B) is deficient in iron

(D) was formed by a collision between two celestial bodies

(E) was formed out of the planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula

20. Which of the following, if true, would be most likely to make it difficult to verify the collision hypothesis in the manner suggested by the author?

(A) The Moon’s core and mantlerock are almost inactive geologically.

(B) The mantlerock of the Earth has changed in composition since the formation of the Moon, while the mantlerock of the Moon has remained chemically inert.

(C) Much of the Earth’s iron fell to the Earth’s core long before the formation of the Moon, after which the Earth’s mantlerock remained unchanged.

(D) Certain of the Earth’s elements, such as platinum, gold, and iridium, followed iron to the Earth’s core.

(E) The mantlerock of the Moon contains elements such as platinum, gold, and iridium.

Surprisingly enough, modern historians have rarely interested themselves in the history of the American South in the period before the South began to become self-consciously and distinctively “Southern”—the decades after 1815. Consequently, the cultural history of Britain’s North American empire in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries has been written almost as if the Southern colonies had never existed. The American culture that emerged during the Colonial and Revolutionary eras has been depicted as having been simply an extension of New England Puritan culture. However, Professor Davis has recently argued that the South stood apart from the rest of American society during this early period, following its own unique pattern of cultural development. The case for Southern distinctiveness rests upon two related premises: first, that the cultural similarities among the five Southern colonies were far more impressive than the differences, and second, that what made those colonies alike also made them different from the other colonies. The first, for which Davis offers an enormous amount of evidence, can be accepted without major reservations; the second is far more problematic.

What makes the second premise problematic is the use of the Puritan colonies as a basis for comparison. Quite properly, Davis decries the excessive influence ascribed by historians to the Puritans in the formation of American culture. Yet Davis inadvertently adds weight to such ascriptions by using the Puritans as the standard against which to assess the achievements and contributions of Southern colonials. Throughout, Davis focuses on the important, and undeniable, differences between the Southern and Puritan colonies in motives for and patterns of early settlement, in attitudes toward nature and Native Americans, and in the degree of receptivity to metropolitan cultural influences.

However, recent scholarship has strongly suggested that those aspects of early New England culture that seem to have been most distinctly Puritan, such as the strong religious orientation and the communal impulse, were not even typical of New England as a whole, but were largely confined to the two colonies of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Thus, what in contrast to the Puritan colonies appears to Davis to be peculiarly Southern—acquisitiveness, a strong interest in politics and the law, and a tendency to cultivate metropolitan cultural models—was not only more typically English than the cultural patterns exhibited by Puritan Massachusetts and Connecticut, but also almost certainly characteristic of most other early modern British colonies from Barbados north to Rhode Island and New Hampshire. Within the larger framework of American colonial life, then, not the Southern but the Puritan colonies appear to have been distinctive, and even they seem to have been rapidly assimilating to the dominant cultural patterns by the late Colonial period.

21. The author is primarily concerned with

(A) refuting a claim about the influence of Puritan culture on the early American South

(B) refuting a thesis about the distinctiveness of the culture of the early American South

(C) refuting the two premises that underlie Davis’ discussion of the culture of the American South in the period before 1815

(D) challenging the hypothesis that early American culture was homogeneous in nature

(E) challenging the contention that the American South made greater contributions to early American culture than Puritan New England did

22. The passage implies that the attitudes toward Native Americans that prevailed in the Southern colonies

(A) were in conflict with the cosmopolitan outlook of the South

(B) derived from Southerners’ strong interest in the law

(D) differed from those that prevailed in the Puritan colonies

(E) developed as a response to attitudes that prevailed in Massachusetts and Connecticut

23. According to the author, the depiction of American culture during the Colonial and Revolutionary eras as an extension of New England Puritan culture reflects the

(A) fact that historians have overestimated the importance of the Puritans in the development of American culture

(B) fact that early American culture was deeply influenced by the strong religious orientation of the colonists

(C) failure to recognize important and undeniable cultural differences between New Hampshire and Rhode Island on the one hand and the Southern colonies on the other

(D) extent to which Massachusetts and Connecticut served as cultural models for the other American colonies

(E) extent to which colonial America resisted assimilating cultural patterns that were typically English

24. The author of the passage is in agreement with which of the following elements of Davis’ book?

I. Davis’ claim that acquisitiveness was a characteristic unique to the South during the Colonial period

II. Davis’ argument that there were significant differences between Puritan and Southern culture during the Colonial period

III. Davis’ thesis that the Southern colonies shared a common culture

(A) I only

(B) II only

(D) I and II only

(E) II and III only

25. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would find Davis’ second premise (lines 18-20) more plausible if it were true that

(A) Puritan culture had displayed the tendency characteristic of the South to cultivate metropolitan cultural models

(B) Puritan culture had been dominant in all the non-Southern colonies during the seventeenth and eighteen centuries

(D) the various cultural patterns of the Southern colonies had more closely resembled each other

(E) the cultural patterns characteristic of most early modern British colonies had also been characteristic of the Puritan colonies

26. The passage suggests that by the late Colonial period the tendency to cultivate metropolitan cultural models was a cultural pattern that was

(A) dying out as Puritan influence began to grow

(B) self-consciously and distinctively Southern

(D) more characteristic of the Southern colonies than of England

(E) beginning to spread to Rhode Island and New Hampshire

27. Which of the following statements could most logically follow the last sentence of the passage?

(A) Thus, had more attention been paid to the evidence, Davis would not have been tempted to argue that the culture of the South diverged greatly from Puritan culture in the seventeenth century.

(B) Thus, convergence, not divergence, seems to have characterized the cultural development of the American colonies in the eighteenth century.

(C) Thus, without the cultural diversity represented by the America South, the culture of colonial America would certainly have been homogeneous in nature.

(D) Thus, the contribution of Southern colonials to American culture was certainly overshadowed by that of the Puritans.

(E) Thus, the culture of America during the Colonial period was far more sensitive to outside influences than historians are accustomed to acknowledge.

答案：17-27：ADDBBDAEBCB

GRE阅读搞定长难句只需3个步骤

篇2：GRE阅读搞定长难句只需3个步骤

GRE阅读：The Color Purple

The publication of The Color Purple transformed Alice Walker from an indu- bitably serious black writer whose fiction belonged to a tradition of gritty, if occasionally “magical,” realism into a popular novelist, with all the perquisites and drawbacks attendant on that position. Unlike either The Third Life of Grange Copland (1970) or Meridian (1976), The Color Purple gained imme- diate and widespread public acceptance, winning both the Pulitzer Prize and the American Book Award for 1982-83. At the same time, however, it generated immediate and widespread critical unease over what appeared to be manifest flaws in its composition. Robert Towers, writing in the New York Review of Books, concluded that on the evidence of The Color Purple “Alice Walker still has a lot to learn about plotting and structuring what is clearly intended to be a realistic novel.” His opinion was shared by many reviewers, who pointed out variously that in the last third of the book the narrator-protagonist Celie and her friends are propelled toward a fairytale happy ending with more velocity than credibility; that the letters from Nettie, with their disconcertingly literate depictions of life in an African village, intrude into the middle of the main action with little apparent motivation or warrant; and that the device of the letters to God is especially unrealistic inasmuch as it foregoes the concretizing details that traditionally have given the epistolatory form its peculiar verisimilitude: the secret writing-place, the cache, the ruses to enable posting letters, and especially the letters received in return.

GRE阅读如何猜生词

新GRE阅读篇章由多个论点组成，论点由作为论据的句子构成，句子本身的典型构成是前后句由表示论证关系的词汇连接，而体现论证的意义的单词最重要。因此，要真懂得文章，就必须把所有那些表现论证的字、词、句抓出。但是面对浩如烟海的GRE词汇，我们如何才能做到准确的去把握词义，把握文章的主要内容呢?

首先要说的是，在阅读教学的研究当中，语言学家们发现，一篇文章中不认识的单词占全文词汇总量的比例只要控制在8%以内，是绝对不会影响到我们对全文任何观点的理解的。基于这一点，我们大家大可不必因为遇到了几个我们完全没见过的奇形怪状的单词而感到头痛和挣扎。因为它们不足以对我们理解文章产生影响。

但同时，我们在阅读文章的过程中也常常会碰到这样的一种单词，那就是专有名词，尤其是涉及全文主题的专有名词，难道我们就必须一一认识它?答案显然是否定的。什么叫做认识专有名词?从英到汉的翻译叫做认识?还是知道专有名词的特征叫做认识?读者请想想看，我们在阅读理解中有没有遇到过这样的问题提法：What is sedge root? 我想没有，因为这种问法是在问专有名词的翻译。我们遇到的更多是这样的一些问法：According to the passage, which of the following statements about sedge root is true? What can be inferred from the passage about sedge root? 这些问题的提法却是在问专有名词的文中阐述特征。我们再从文章本身对这个问题做出进一步的分析。

假设原文有这样一句话：Sedge root, a woody fiber that can be easily separated into strands, is essential to basketry production. 请问sedge root的中文翻译“莎草的根” 能够帮助我们解决阅读理解题目吗?我想很难!真正能够帮助我们解决阅读理解题目的应该是这样的文字a woody fiber (木制纤维)和定语从句中的文字部分can be easily separated into strands (能够轻易地被分割成线)。通过以上的分析，想必大家已经非常清楚地认识到，过去我们拼命去死记硬背专有名词的中文释义是多么愚蠢的行为。因为真正的认识应该是对特征的认识，所以一个专有名词和他的中文释义对我们来说是没有任何意义的，毕竟我们对它们都没有任何的概念。

最后很多人都说我们可以从上下文中猜出单词的释义，难道真的是这样么? 笔者认为从上下文中猜出单词的释义是不现实的。例如有这样一句话“Supernova is a massive star which undergoes gravitational collapse.” 我们是不可能从上下文中猜出supernova的释义“超新星”的。而我们真正能够做到的只是从上下文中猜出单词的特征：supernova是巨大的恒星(massive star)，它在进行引力收缩(undergoes gravitational collapse)。于是以后当我们遇到不认识的单词，我们可以再也不用停下来思考单词的释义，也不用费尽思量地去猜所谓的单词的释义，我们需要做的只是静下心来在后面找到单词在文章当中传达的特征就可以.

本文来自 360文秘网(www.360wenmi.com)，转载请保留网址和出处

【GRE阅读搞定长难句只需3个步骤】相关文章：

GRE阅读思路的04-12