GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些

GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些（精选2篇）

篇1：GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些

The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.

“Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland.”

Since the residents are changing the original statement that complies with the conditions of what an undeveloped site is, it is their responsibility to make sure that certain restrictions are followed. According to the definition of undeveloped land, keeping the natural elements and avoiding the tearing down of this elements is an issue to consider even if it is a school built on the site.

Even though the residents originally wanted to keep the property undeveloped and unbuilt, the fact that they emphasize that this area will subtantially be devoted to athletic fields, strongly supports the idea of the residents using the land for similar activities than that of the public parkland, . Moreover, the fact that the residents mentioned the community as being one where children will be the main participants of this area is persuasive enough to make this argument a strong one.

Comments:

This response is seriously flawed. The first paragraph obliquely addresses the argument made in the topic, but stops short of logical analysis. The second paragraph agrees with the argument and supports its assumptions. In essence, the writer exhibits an uncritical acceptance of the argument.

Aside from a few minor errors, the writer has control over syntax, grammar, and the conventions of standard written English. This response, though, warrants a score of 2, because it offers no discernible analysis of the logic of the argument.

GRE作文

篇2：GRE作文argument逻辑攻击点有哪些

GRE考试中如何围绕因果关系出题?

首先大家需要了解的是GRE考试中是如何围绕因果关系来出题的，举个简单的例子，突然觉得胃痛，而之前刚吃了一份半生不熟的食物，那么这两者之间就存在了一定的因果关系，而如果胃痛是因为吃了生食，先不论这究竟是不是事实，围绕这种因果关系就会常见这些选项或者说提问方式：

1. 是否可能有其它原因导致胃痛?

假设assumption选项：不存在其它原因，就是因为吃了生食。

加强strengthen选项：平时也没有胃病，之前从来没吃过熟食等等，通过排除其它原因来强化这种因果关系。

削弱weaken选项：最近一直胃不舒服，可能是有点胃病症状，通过加入其它原因来削弱这种英国关系。

2. 因果关系是否能互换?

假设assumption选项：先吃的生食，然后才胃痛，明确两者之间的先后顺序。

加强strengthen选项：吃生食是在12点，胃痛是在2点。通过给出实际证据加强对因果关系的证明。

削弱weaken选项：好像吃生食之前胃就有点不舒服，或是因为胃不舒服所以才想吃点刺身之类不油腻的食物。通过给出反面证据来扭转因果关系。

3. 是否只是巧合?两件事之间其实并无因果关系?

假设assumption选项：某某科学机构研究表明吃生食必然会导致胃痛，两者之间就是这么简单的因果关系。

加强strengthen选项：吃生食的确很容易导致胃痛，某些数据证明等等。通过侧面正面加强因果关系，表明并非是巧合。

削弱weaken选项：吃生食的人很多但胃痛只是个别现象。从反面增加巧合的可能性，削弱两者之间的因果关系。

GRE考试因果关系常见逻辑关系词

有鉴于因果关系在GRE考试中出现频率很高，因此一些比较常见的因果关系词汇大家也需要有所了解，在遇到相应题目时这些关系词能给大家提供很好的解题线索：

due to, result of, cause, because, reason why等等。

因果关系和相互关系的区别

另外，GRE考试的常考逻辑关系causality中，有一种和因果关系比较接近的关系考生比较容易混淆，那就是相互关系correlation，两者之间虽然有一定的相似性，但其实还是有本质区别的，因果关系就是A事件发生导致了B事件发生，而相互关系则是A事件发生了，B事件也发生了，两者之间存在一定关联性，但并没有本质上的因果关系。大家需要明确两者的区别，特别是在逻辑阅读的选项判断时需要注意两者差异。

GRE分类词汇记忆：组成

3.21.3 组成

compose v. 组成;写，创作

constitute v. 组成，构成;建立

construct v. 构成，建筑，(建造)

formation n. 组织，形成;(军队)编队

formality n. 遵循的规范;拘泥形式;正式

formative adj. 形成的，影响发展的

institutionalized adj. 有组织的，制度化的

realign v. 重新组合(排列)

recombine v. 重组，再结合 (recombinant n. 重组体)

reconstitute v. 再组成;用水泡

component n. 成分，零部件

constituent n. 成分;选区内的选民

ingredient n. 成分

segment n. 部分 (segmentable adj. 可分割的 segmental adj. 部分的，片段的)

GRE分类词汇记忆

3.36.2 下降

descend v. 下来，下降

plummet v. 垂直或突然坠下;(n. 测深锤)

slippage n. 下降，滑动

slump v. 猛然落下;暴跌

GRE分类词汇记忆：减少

3.36.1 减少，减轻

abate v. 减少，减轻

abrade v. 磨损，磨小 (abraded adj. 磨损的)

brake v. 减速，阻止;n. 刹车

deaden v. 减低某物的力量或强度(削弱力量)

debilitate v. 使衰弱

decline v. 变弱，变小;拒绝;n. 消减

deduct v. 减去，扣除;演绎

detract v. 减去，贬低

dilute v. 把(液体)弄稀，弄淡

diminuendo n. (音乐、演奏)渐弱

diminution n. 减少，缩减

dwindle v. 变小

emasculate v. 削弱;阉割;adj. 柔弱的

flag v. 减弱，衰退;枯萎;(n. 旗，国旗)

impair v. 使弱，损害

implode v. 剧减;内爆

languish v. 衰弱;变得消瘦

minimize v. 把…减至最低数量或程度(最小化)

relent v. 减弱;动怜悯心

relenting adj. 减弱的，怜悯的

retard v. 减速;妨碍

sap v. 消弱，耗尽;n. 树液;活力

subtract v. 减去，减掉 (subtraction n. 减，减法)

taper v. (长形物体的)逐渐变短;n. 细蜡烛

underplay v. 淡化…的重要性;表演(角色)不充分

vitiate v. 削弱，损害

wane v. 减少，衰微;(月亏)

waste v. 损耗，使身体消瘦

abate v. 减轻，减少

allay v. 减轻，缓和

alleviate v. 缓和，减轻

assuage v. 缓和，减轻

buffer v. 缓冲，为…充当缓冲器

cushion v. 缓冲;n. 坐垫

defuse v. 缓和紧张状态或危急局面;从(爆破装置)中卸除引信

disarm v. 使缓和;缴某人的械

mitigate v. 减轻，缓和

palliate v. 减轻(痛苦);掩饰(罪行) (palliation n. 减轻，缓和)

palliative adj. 减轻的，缓和的;n. 缓释剂

salve v. 减轻，缓和;n. 药膏

soothe v. 减轻;抚慰

subdue v. 减轻;征服;压制

subdued adj. 缓和的，(光和声)柔和的;(人)温和的

temper v. 缓和;锤炼;n. 脾气

damp v. 减弱，制止振动(减振);adj. 潮湿的

damped adj. 减震的，压低(声音)的

muffle v. 使声音降低;裹住

muffled adj. (声音)压低的

muffler n. 消音器;围巾

mute v. 减弱声音;n. 弱音器;adj. 沉默的

muted adj. (声音)减弱的，变得轻柔的

abbreviate v. 缩短;缩写 (abbreviation n. 缩短;缩写)

abridge v. 删减;缩短

bowdlerize v. 删除，删改

curtail v. 削减，缩短

decline n. 消减;v. 变弱，变小;拒绝

diminution n. 缩减，减少

dock v. 剪短;扣除…的一部分工资

pare v. 削减，缩减;削;修剪

retrenchment n. 削减，节省

truncate v. 把(某物)截短，去尾

whittle v. 削减;削(木头)

ellipsis n. 省略

elliptical adj. 省略的;椭圆的;晦涩的 (ellipse n. 椭圆)

omit v. 省略，遗漏;疏忽

GRE分类词汇记忆：救助

3.16.3 救助

extricable adj. 可解救的，能脱险的

extricate v. 拯救，救出

rescue n./v. 解救;把…从法律监管下强行夺回

salvage n./v. (从灾难中)抢救，海上救助 (salvable adj. 可抢救的)