朱棣与绞股蓝的故事

第一篇：朱棣与绞股蓝的故事

绞股蓝饮品行业协会章程

xx县绞股蓝饮品行业协会章程(二○○四年

月

日会员大会通过)第一章总则第一条本会名称：xx县绞股蓝饮品行业协会，绞股蓝饮品行业协会章程。第二条办会依照《社会团体登记管理条例》进行组建，为本县绞股蓝饮品行业的企业、事业单位自愿组成的跨部门、跨所有制的非营利的行业性社会团体法人。第三条本会宗旨：遵守宪法、法律、法规和国家政策，以政府经济发展战略为指导，在行业管理中发挥积极作用，为增强企业市场竞争力，维护企业合法权益，促进本县绞股蓝饮品行业的发展提供服务。第四条本会的行业业务主管单位是xx县……，协会业务主管单位是xx县……，登记主管单位是xx县民政局。本会同时接受xx县科学技术协会、xx县经济贸易局的业务指导和监督管理。第二章任务、业务范围和活动原则第五条本会的任务是：㈠宣传贯彻国家的各项方针、政策，促进绞股蓝饮品企业提高国内外市场竞争力;㈡收集、整理国内外绞股蓝饮品行业的技术、管理、市场等方面的信息，并办好刊物向会员传递;㈢组织拓展，发布市场信息，推介行业产品;㈣代表本行业向有关国家机关反映涉及行业利益的事项，提出经济政策和立法方面的意见和建议;㈤根据国家法律、法规，代表行业内相关企业向政府有关部门提出反倾销、反补贴调查或者采取保障措施的申请，协助政府有关部门完成相关调查;㈥制订行业内争议处理的规则和程序，对会员之间、会员与非会员之间或者与消费者之间就行业经营活动产生的争议事项进行协调;㈦制订并监督执行本行业行规行约，恪守诚信原则。对违反行规行约，损害行业整体形象的会员，采取相应的行业自律措施;对违法经营的企业，建议政府有关部门予以查处;㈧接受政府有关部门转移或者委托本协会承担得行业评估论证、技能资质考核、行业统计调查、行业发展规划和有关技术标准得制订等职能。第六条本会的业务范围是：行业调研、行业统计、岗位培训、技术培训、技术交流、信息服务、编辑出版、会展招商、产品推介、中介咨询、公信证明，承担政府部门、其他团体及会员单位委托办理的事项。第七条本会活动原则：㈠本会按照核准的章程开展活动，遵守有关的法规、规章和政策，遵守社会道德风尚;㈡本会开展活动，诚信守信、公正公平、不弄虚作假，不损害国家、其它单位和个人的利益;㈢本会不以协会名义从事经营活动，如以举办的经营实体名义开展活动，则不与本行业内的企业争利;㈣本会开展活动时，遵循民主办会、自主办会原则，做到人员自聘、经费自筹、工作自主。第三章

会员第八条本会的会员是单位会员，申请加入必须具备下列条件：㈠依法取得本县工商营业执照，从事绞股蓝饮品行业生产、经营、科研、开发的企业、个体工商户、事业单位和其它经济组织。在本县设有分支机构、连续营业6个月以上的非本县登记的企业、个体工商户或者其它经济组织;㈡承认本会章程;㈢自愿加入本会。第九条会员入会程序是：㈠提交入会申请书;㈡秘书处派员到申请单位实地考察了解，提出初审意见;㈢由常务理事会讨论批准，并发给会员证书。第十条会员享有下列权利：㈠享有本会的选举权、被选举权和表决权;㈡参加本会举办的有关活动;㈢优先获得本会的服务;㈣对本会工作的批评建议权和监督权;㈤有求助本会提供帮助的权利;㈥入会自愿，退会自由。第十一条会员应履行下列义务：㈠遵守本会章程、执行本会决议，服从行规行约，维护行业利益;㈡完成本会委托的工作，支持并参加本会的各项活动;㈢按规定时限和标准交纳会费;㈣主动向本会反映情况，提供有关资料、报表，管理制度《绞股蓝饮品行业协会章程》。第十二条会员退会应向本会递交书面函件，并交回会员证。会员如果在两年内无故不缴纳会费或不参加本会活动的，可取消其会员资格，并通报全体会员。第十三条会员严重违反国家法律、法规或本会章程的，经理事会三分之二以上与会者通过，予以除名并公示。第四章

组织机构第十四条本会的最高权力机构是会员大会。其职权是：㈠制定和修改章程;㈡选举和罢免理事;㈢审议理事会的工作报告和财务报告;㈣决定终止事宜;㈤决定其他重大事项。第十五条会员大会(年会)每年召开一次。会员大会(权力机构)须有三分之二以上的会员出席方能召开，其决议须经到会会员三分之二以上表决通过方能生效。第十六条会员大会(权力机构)每届四年。因特殊情况需提前或延期换届的，须由理事会表决通过，报业务主管单位审查同意并经xx县民政局批准。但延期换届最长不超过一年。第十七条本会设理事会，理事会是会员大会(权力机构)的执行机构，在会员大会(权力机构)闭会期间领导本会开展日常工作，对会员大会(权力机构)负责。第十八条理事会的职权是：㈠执行会员大会(权力机构)的决议;㈡选举和罢免理事长、副理事长及常务理事;㈢召开会员大会(年会)，并向会员大会(年会)报告工作和财务状况;㈣决定会员的除名;㈤决定分支机构、代表机构和实体机构的设立和注消;㈥决定分支机构、代表机构和实体机构主要负责人的聘任和免职;㈦根据理事长的提名，决定秘书长人选的聘免;㈧根据秘书长的提名，决定副秘书长人选的聘免;㈨领导各机构开展工作;㈩决定其它重大事项。第十九条理事会须有三分之二以上理事出席方能召开，其决议须经到会理事三分之二以上表决通过方能生效。理事会每年至少召开一次会议;情况特殊可随时召开。增补理事，应经会员大会选举。特殊情况下可由理事会补选，但补选理事应经下一次会员大会追认。第二十条本会设立常务理事会，常务理事会由理事会选举产生。在理事会闭会期间行使第十八条第

一、

四、

五、

九、十等项的职权，对理事会负责。第二十一条常务理事会须有三分之二以上常务理事会出席方能召开，其决议须经到会常务理事三分之二以上通过方能生效。常务理事会至少半年召开一次会议;情况特殊可随时召开。增补常务理事，应经理事会选举。特殊情况下可由常务理事会补选，但补选的常务理事应经下一次理事会追认。补选的常务理事应在理事中产生。第二十二条本会的理事长、副理事长必须具备下列条件：㈠在行业内有较大影响;㈡最高任职年龄不超过70周岁;㈢身体健康，能坚持正常工作;㈣无刑事处罚记录，但过失犯罪的除外;㈤具有完全民事行为能力。第二十三条本会理事长、副理事长的任期四年，连任不得超过两届。因特殊情况须延长任期的，须经会员大会(权力机构)三分之二以上会员表决通过，报业务主管单位审查同意并经xx县民政局批准后方可任职。第二十四条本会理事长为法定代表人。本会法定代表人在国家机关无现任公职，个人信用良好。本会法定代表人不兼任其它社会团体的法定代表人。第二十五条本会理事长行使下列职权：㈠召集和主持理事会;㈡检查会员大会(权力机构)、理事会决议的落实情况;㈢代表本协会签署有关重要文件。第二十六条本会秘书处是理事会的日常办事机构。由秘书长主持秘书处日常工作，其任职条件参照第二十二条。秘书处的工作人员必须是专职人员，人事分配制度和社会保障制度按照本县有关规定执行。第二十七条本协会秘书长行使下列职权：㈠主持秘书处开展日常工作，组织实施工作计划;㈡协调各分支机构、代表机构和实体机构开展工作;㈢提名分支机构、代表机构和实体机构的负责人，交理事会决定;㈣决定办事机构、代表机构和实体机构专职工作人员的聘用和辞退;㈤处理其它日常事务。第二十八条为有利于本会工作，可聘请熟悉本行业业务、关心本行业发展，积极为本行业工作并做出贡献的专家、学者及有关人士担任名誉职务或顾问。第五章

资产管理、使用原则第二十九条本会经费的来源：㈠会费;㈡捐赠;㈢承办政府部门委托事项获得的资助;㈣在核准的业务范围内开展活动或服务的收入;㈤利息;㈥其他合法收入。第三十条本会经费必须用于本章程规定的业务范围和事业的发展，不在会员中分配。第三十一条本会建立严格的财务管理制度，保证会计资料合法、真实、准确、完整。第三十二条本会配备具有专业资格的会计人员。会计不得兼任出纳。会计人员必须进行会计核算，实行会计监督。会计人员调动工作或离职时，必须与接管人员办理交接手续。第三十三条本会的资产管理严格执行国家规定的财务管理制度，接受会员大会(权力机构)和上级财务部门的监督。资产来源属于国家拨款或者社会捐赠、资助的，接受审计机关的监督，并将有关情况以适当方式向社会公布。本会的资产，任何单位和个人不得侵占、私分和挪用。第三十四条本会换届或更换法定代表人之前，聘请专业审计事务所审计，并作出审计报告。第六章

章程的修改程序第三十五条本会章程的修改，须经理事会审议后报会员大会(权力机构)表决通过。第三十六条修改后的章程，须在会员大会(权力机构)通过后，经业务主管单位审查同意之日起30日内，报xx县民政局核准并生效。第七章终止程序及废止后的财产处理第三十七条本会因故解散或由于分立、合并等原因需要注销的，由理事会提出终止动议。第三十八条终止动议须经会员大会(权力机构)表决通过，并报业务主管单位审查同意。第三十九条本会终止前，须在业务主管单位及有关部门指导下成立清算组织，清理债权债务，处理善后事宜。清算期间，不开展清算以外的活动。第四十条本会经xx县民政局办理注销登记手续后即为终止。第四十一条本会终止后的剩余财产，在业务主管单位、xx县民政局的监督下，按照国家有关规定，用于发展与本会宗旨相关的事业。第七章

附则第四十二条本章程经二○○四年月日会员大会表决通过。第四十三条本章程的解释权属本会理事会。第四十四条本章程自xx县民政局核准之日起生效。

第二篇：美国能源部长朱棣文哈佛大学毕业典礼演讲

2009 Commencement Address at Harvard University

- U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu Madam President Faust, members of the Harvard Corporation and the Board of Overseers, faculty, family, friends, and, most importantly, today’s graduates, Thank you for letting me share this wonderful day with you. I am not sure I can live up to the high standards of Harvard Commencement speakers. Last year, J.K. Rowling, the billionaire novelist, who started as a classics student, graced this podium. The year before, Bill Gates, the mega-billionaire philanthropist and computer nerd stood here. Today, sadly, you have me. I am not wealthy, but at least I am a nerd. I am grateful to receive an honorary degree from Harvard, an honor that means more to me than you might care to imagine. You see, I was the academic black sheep of my family. My older brother has an M.D./Ph.D. from MIT and Harvard while my younger brother has a law degree from Harvard. When I was awarded a Nobel Prize, jwothe announcement, she replied, “That’s nice, but when are you going to visit me next.” Now, as the last brother with a degree from Harvard, maybe, at last, she will be satisfied. Another difficulty with giving a Harvard commencement address is that some of you may disapprove of the fact that I have borrowed material from previous speeches. I ask that you forgive me for two reasons. First, in order to have impact, it is important to deliver the same message more than once. In science, it is important to be the first person to make a discovery, but it is even more important to be the last person to make that discovery. Second, authors who borrow from others are following in the footsteps of the best. Ralph Waldo Emerson, who graduated from Harvard at the age of 18, noted “All my best thoughts were stolen by the ancients.” Picasso declared “Good artists borrow. Great artists steal.” Why should commencement speakers be held to a higher standard? I also want to point out the irony of speaking to graduates of an institution that would have rejected me, had I the chutzpah to apply. I am married to “Dean Jean,” the former dean of admissions at Stanford. She assures me that she would have rejected me, if given the chance. When I showed her a draft of this speech, she objected strongly to my use of the word “rejected.” She never rejected applicants; her letters stated that “we are unable to offer you admission.” I have difficulty understanding the difference. After all, deans of admissions of highly selective schools are in reality, “deans of rejection.” Clearly, I have a lot to learn about marketing.

My address will follow the classical sonata form of commencement addresses. The first movement, just presented, were light-hearted remarks. This next movement consists of unsolicited advice, which is rarely valued, seldom remembered, never followed. As Oscar Wilde said, “The only thing to do with good advice is to pass it on. It is never of any use to oneself.” So, here comes the advice. First, every time you celebrate an achievement, be thankful to those who made it possible. Thank your parents and friends who supported you, thank your professors who were inspirational, and especially thank the other professors whose less-than-brilliant lectures forced you to teach yourself. Going forward, the ability to teach yourself is the hallmark of a great liberal arts education and will be the key to your success. To your fellow students who have added immeasurably to your education during those late night discussions, hug them. Also, of course, thank Harvard. Should you forget, there’s an alumni association to remind you. Second, in your future life, cultivate a generous spirit. In all negotiations, don’t bargain for the last, little advantage. Leave the change on the table. In your collaborations, always remember that “credit” is not a conserved quantity. In a successful collaboration, everybody gets 90 percent of the credit. Another difficulty with giving a Harvard commencement address is that some of you may disapprove of the fact that I have borrowed material from previous speeches. I ask that you forgive me for two reasons. First, in order to have impact, it is important to deliver the same message more than once. In science, it is important to be the first person to make a discovery, but it is even more important to be the last person to make that discovery. Second, authors who borrow from others are following in the footsteps of the best. Ralph Waldo Emerson, who graduated from Harvard at the age of 18, noted “All my best thoughts were stolen by the ancients.” Picasso declared “Good artists borrow. Great artists steal.” Why should commencement speakers be held to a higher standard? I also want to point out the irony of speaking to graduates of an institution that would have rejected me, had I the chutzpah to apply. I am married to “Dean Jean,” the former dean of admissions at Stanford. She assures me that she would have rejected me, if given the chance. When I showed her a draft of this speech, she objected strongly to my use of the word “rejected.” She never rejected applicants; her letters stated that “we are unable to offer you admission.” I have difficulty understanding the difference. After all, deans of admissions of highly selective schools are in reality, “deans of rejection.” Clearly, I have a lot to learn about marketing. My address will follow the classical sonata form of commencement addresses. The first movement, just presented, were light-hearted remarks. This next movement consists of unsolicited advice, which is rarely valued, seldom remembered, never followed. As Oscar Wilde said, “The only thing to do with good advice is to pass it on. It is never of any use to oneself.” So, here comes the advice. First, every time you

celebrate an achievement, be thankful to those who made it possible. Thank your parents and friends who supported you, thank your professors who were inspirational, and especially thank the other professors whose less-than-brilliant lectures forced you to teach yourself. Going forward, the ability to teach yourself is the hallmark of a great liberal arts education and will be the key to your success. To your fellow students who have added immeasurably to your education during those late night discussions, hug them. Also, of course, thank Harvard. Should you forget, there’s an alumni association to remind you. Second, in your future life, cultivate a generous spirit. In all negotiations, don’t bargain for the last, little advantage. Leave the change on the table. In your collaborations, always remember that “credit” is not a conserved quantity. In a successful collaboration, everybody gets 90 percent of the credit. Here is my final piece of advice. Pursuing a personal passion is important, but it should not be your only goal. When you are old and gray, and look back on your life, you will want to be proud of what you have done. The source of that pride won’t be the things you have acquired or the recognition you have received. It will be the lives you have touched and the difference you have made. After nine years at Bell labs, I decided to leave that warm, cozy ivory tower for what I considered to be the “real world,” a university. Bell Labs, to quote what was said about Mary Poppins, was “practically perfect in every way,” but I wanted to leave behind something more than scientific articles. I wanted to teach and give birth to my own set of scientific children. Ted Geballe, a friend and distinguished colleague of mine at Stanford, who also went from Berkeley to Bell Labs to Stanford years earlier, described our motives best: “The best part of working at a university is the students. They come in fresh, enthusiastic, open to ideas, unscarred by the battles of life. They don’t realize it, but they’re the recipients of the best our society can offer. If a mind is ever free to be creative, that’s the time. They come in believing textbooks are authoritative, but eventually they figure out that textbooks and professors don’t know everything, and then they start to think on their own. Then, I begin learning from them.”

My students, post doctoral fellows, and the young researchers who worked with me at Bell Labs, Stanford, and Berkeley have been extraordinary. Over 30 former group members are now professors, many at the best research institutions in the world, including Harvard. I have learned much from them. Even now, in rare moments on weekends, the remaining members of my biophysics group meet with me in the ether world of cyberspace. I began teaching with the idea of giving back; I received more than I gave. This brings me to the final movement of this speech. It begins with a story about an extraordinary scientific discovery and a new dilemma that it poses. It’s a call to arms and about making a difference.

In the last several decades, our climate has been changing. Climate change is not new: the Earth went through six ice ages in the past 600,000 years. However, recent measurements show that the climate has begun to change rapidly. The size of the North Polar Ice Cap in the month of September is only half the size it was a mere 50 years ago. The sea level which been rising since direct measurements began in 1870 at a rate that is now five times faster than it was at the beginning of recorded measurements. Here’s the remarkable scientific discovery. For the first time in human history, science is now making predictions of how our actions will affect the world 50 and 100 years from now. These changes are due to an increase in carbon dioxide put into the atmosphere since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The Earth has warmed up by roughly 0.8 degrees Celsius since the beginning of the Revolution. There is already approximately a 1 degree rise built into the system, even if we stop all greenhouse gas emissions today. Why? It will take decades to warm up the deep oceans before the temperature reaches a new equilibrium. If the world continues on a business-as-usual path, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that there is a fifty-fifty chance the temperature will exceed 5 degrees by the end of this century. This increase may not sound like much, but let me remind you that during the last ice age, the world was only 6 degrees colder. During this time, most of Canada and the United States down to Ohio and Pennsylvania were covered year round by a glacier. A world 5 degrees warmer will be very different. The change will be so rapid that many species, including Humans, will have a hard time adapting. I’ve been told for example, that, in a much warmer world, insects were bigger. I wonder if this thing buzzing around is a precursor. We also face the specter of nonlinear “tipping points” that may cause much more severe changes. An example of a tipping point is the thawing of the permafrost. The permafrost contains immense amounts of frozen organic matter that have been accumulating for millennia. If the soil melts, microbes will spring to life and cause this debris to rot. The difference in biological activity below freezing and above freezing is something we are all familiar with. Frozen food remains edible for a very long time in the freezer, but once thawed, it spoils quickly. How much methane and carbon dioxide might be released from the rotting permafrost? If even a fraction of the carbon is released, it could be greater than all the greenhouse gases we have released to since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Once started, a runaway effect could occur. The climate problem is the unintended consequence of our success. We depend on fossil energy to keep our homes warm in the winter, cool in the summer, and lit at night; we use it to travel across town and across continents. Energy is a fundamental reason for the prosperity we enjoy, and we will not surrender this prosperity. The United States has 3 percent of the world population, and yet, we consume 25 percent of the energy. By contrast, there are 1.6 billion people who don’t have access to electricity. Hundreds of millions of people still cook with twigs or dung. The life we

enjoy may not be within the reach of the developing world, but it is within sight, and they want what we have. Here is the dilemma. How much are we willing to invest, as a world society, to mitigate the consequences of climate change that will not be realized for at least 100 years? Deeply rooted in all cultures, is the notion of generational responsibility. Parents work hard so that their children will have a better life. Climate change will affect the entire world, but our natural focus is on the welfare of our immediate families. Can we, as a world society, meet our responsibility to future generations? While I am worried, I am hopeful we will solve this problem. I became the director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, in part because I wanted to enlist some of the best scientific minds to help battle against climate change. I was there only four and a half years, the shortest serving director in the 78-year history of the Lab, but when I left, a number of very exciting energy institutes at the Berkeley Lab and UC Berkeley had been established. I am extremely privileged to be part of the Obama administration. If there ever was a time to help steer America and the world towards a path of sustainable energy, now is the time. The message the President is delivering is not one of doom and gloom, but of optimism and opportunity. I share this optimism. The task ahead is daunting, but we can and will succeed. We know some of the answers already. There are immediate and significant savings in energy efficiency and conservation. Energy efficiency is not just low-hanging fruit; it is fruit lying on the ground. For example, we have the potential to make buildings 80 percent more efficient with investments that will pay for themselves in less than 15 years. Buildings consume 40 percent of the energy we use, and a transition to energy efficient buildings will cut our carbon emissions by one-third. We are revving up the remarkable American innovation machine that will be the basis of a new American prosperity. We will invent much improved methods to harness the sun, the wind, nuclear power, and capture and sequester the carbon dioxide emitted from our power plants. Advanced bio-fuels and the electrification of personal vehicles make us less dependent on foreign oil. In the coming decades, we will almost certainly face higher oil prices and be in a carbon-constrained economy. We have the opportunity to lead in development of a new, industrial revolution. The great hockey player, Wayne Gretzky, when asked, how he positions himself on the ice, he replied,“ I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it’s been.” America should do the same. The Obama administration is laying a new foundation for a prosperous and sustainable energy future, but we don’t have all of the answers. That’s where you come in. In this address, I am asking you, the Harvard graduates, to join us. As our future intellectual leaders, take the time to learn more about what’s at stake, and then

act on that knowledge. As future scientists and engineers, I ask you to give us better technology solutions. As future economists and political scientists, I ask you to create better policy options. As future business leaders, I ask that you make sustainability an integral part of your business. Finally, as humanists, I ask that you speak to our common humanity. One of the cruelest ironies about climate change is that the ones who will be hurt the most are the most innocent: the worlds poorest and those yet to be born. The coda to this last movement is borrowed from two humanists. The first quote is from Martin Luther King. He spoke on ending the war in Vietnam in 1967, but his message seems so fitting for today’s climate crisis:

“This call for a worldwide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one’s tribe, race, class, and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing and unconditional love for all mankind. This oft misunderstood, this oft misinterpreted concept, so readily dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force, has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of man … We are now faced with the fact, my friends, that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history, there is such a thing as being too late.”

The final message is from William Faulkner. On December 10th, 1950, his Nobel Prize banquet speech was about the role of humanists in a world facing potential nuclear holocaust. “I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail. He is immortal, not because he alone among creatures has an inexhaustible voice, but because he has a soul, a spirit capable of compassion and sacrifice and endurance. The poet’s, the writer’s, duty is to write about these things. It is his privilege to help man endure by lifting his heart, by reminding him of the courage and honor and hope and pride and compassion and pity and sacrifice which have been the glory of his past.”

Graduates, you have an extraordinary role to play in our future. As you pursue your private passions, I hope you will also develop a passion and a voice to help the world in ways both large and small. Nothing will give you greater satisfaction. Please accept my warmest congratulations. May you prosper, may you help preserve and save our planet for your children, and all future children of the world.

第三篇：故事中的故事——阿郎的故事

很久，很久没有耐下性子去看一部电影了，很久也没有为那一部电影如此的感动过。确切地说，是因为“轻飘飘的旧时光就这么溜走，转头回去看看时已匆匆数年„„黑漆漆的孤枕边是你的温柔，醒来时的清晨里是我的哀愁。人生难得再次寻觅相知的伴侣，生命终究难舍蓝蓝的白云天„„”这样的歌词首先感动了我，第一次听到这首歌是一个人在一个梅雨连绵的房间里，房子很大，大到足以让我窒息，绝望的CD机和电视在旋转着，当音响中传出这首歌曲的旋律时，我才抬头看了看屏幕。哦，罗大佑，一位有着自己独特视角的音乐人。接着，抛开阴雨天气生长的荒芜，耐心地把这首歌听完了，中途，竟然发现自己的眼睛已经不由自主地湿了，像窗外的雨声一样悄悄地湿了整个世界。

好久，好久没有这样为一首歌曲，一部电影感动了。只记得中学时一个人在电影院中看《泰坦尼克号》流过眼泪，后来一直不曾再有。后来，空空的房间里就多了这首歌曲，罗大佑嘶哑、苍凉声音;周润发玩世不恭却又努力生活的音容笑貌，一直萦绕盘旋着。MP3，CD，硬碟都搜集全了。感觉着，别样的生活却又如此真实地让人悲伤而心疼。张艾嘉的眼神，波仔子的活波可爱，周润发的无奈积极生活„„一位朋友和我同看时，曾说，我希望自己以后生一个像波仔一样的儿子。我笑笑，心里却酸涩的无言以对，当影片最后的悲哀来袭时，我只记得周润发透过血迹斑斑的头盔的玻璃向波仔和张艾嘉看的眼神„„

这部影片很老，只比我小那么几岁。但可绝对是经典中的经典，看到发哥打在儿身痛在父心的无奈心情，我是有些煽然泪下的感觉，现实中的很多事情已经让人觉得麻木了，但是在这么一部普通的电影中却深深的打动着人的内心，正是因为它的平凡和它描写的社会底层小人物的真实生活才打动了无数观众，也许这也是它最令我感动的地方。看多了无聊的泡沫制作，看多了各种无聊的花式打斗，看多了各种无病呻吟的爱情，这样的影片让人怀念，更让人怀念反应的那种干净的真实的生活与感情。

时下，一切都在坍塌，没有什么能去阻挡。包括每个人都向往的纯美的亲情、爱情，都无不被人们自己亲手打上了“条件”的马赛克，确切地说就是金钱的马赛克。感动的因子正是因为彷佛只有在那个时代才有那样的纯美与纯正。阿郎的自身是多少人的写照，这里自不必我去多说，至少在我被它感动就是因为自己曾经或者正在经历着。在这里向导演杜琪峰，还有扮演电影里主人翁的周润发、张艾嘉亲情的演出和制作插曲《恋曲1990》片尾曲《你的样子》的罗大佑及其他

音乐人表示致敬。

阿郎与儿子波仔的感情便是因为经历了近乎完美的生活风暴才开始如刚开瓶的陈年酒，散发出阵阵浓郁的香气。这也许是一个司空见惯的故事，在杜琪峰不温不火的掌控下，阿郎这个人物在散漫不羁中有着另类的温柔。想起老杜作品《放逐》里的一句台词“一吨的梦想有多重!”可以改换一下变成一个形容词加在阿郎身上- “一吨的错误有多重!”年轻是一把双刃剑，它让人可以尽情地对自己进行自我原谅，自我放纵，沉溺于声色犬马的享受中，往往会在你进入而立之年的时刻，运用健康、财富等种种似乎是某种冥冥中的惩戒施加要命的一击。阿郎天生有开车的禀赋，因为欲望失去爱情，因为放纵失去事业，最后潦倒地在工地干活。后来偶遇失散的老婆，经历了爱情和亲情的双重煎熬，醒来时发现“无可奈何花落去”，想要重新拥有一个完整的家已不可能，而对儿子的无法割舍和渴望他能过上比自己幸福生活的矛盾更使他倍感煎熬，最后他为了儿子的幸福毅然去参加比赛，因为一场意外在烈焰中结束自己的生命。影片中最感人的地方不是阿郎的舍身成仁，而是阿郎为使得儿子回到母亲身边，狠下心来用衣架对着儿子的屁股痛揍。阿郎的善意与他的下的狠心一般无可指责，他没有郎雄所塑造的父亲那种博大与深沉，多的是“孟母三迁”里包含的温柔和关爱。人在爱中感受到温暖，感受到责任，阿郎在狱中看着自己小孩的眼神，除了悔恨，散发的是可以把年轻的水分都蒸发掉的热量。

为这部电影感动，因为里面还包含着让人缅怀的因素。每个人都有自己的“阿基里斯之腱”，都曾为年轻做出一些可以贴上疯狂标签的事情。阿郎那种发型，在我们眼里已显得过时，阿郎那破破烂烂的牛仔裤，在现在看来不会再具有强烈的震撼和异样的美感，阿郎的满口脏话，在现在也许很小的小孩都会说。这比《老港正传》里自行标榜的怀旧更令人陶醉，这是一个普通的人，只在一到两个地方表现出自己的伟大之处，不会有什么特别的心机，连到西餐厅点的都是啤酒。伟人，在一些哲人的笔下，成为了整个人类智慧的代言，庆幸的是，电影给予了许多讲普通人的故事的机会，也让人体会到，道德，也完完全全可以由并没有开天辟地的作为的人来代言，自不必老围绕古代儒者眼里黄金时代里的至圣来做文章。

这部电影杜琪峰没有运用特立独行的叙事风格，只是在缓缓地让故事展开，让情感可以在宽阔的河床中尽情地流淌，看过之后，仔细品酌，才发现舔犊之情，两个人的爱情，原也五味杂陈。

第四篇：故事的故事影评

《故事中的故事》是由Archimede、Le Pacte等公司联合出品的一部奇幻片，该片由马提欧·加洛尼执导，萨尔玛·海耶克、文森特·卡索等人主演。该片改编自17世纪由吉姆巴地斯达·巴西耳创作出版的那不勒斯语童话故事集《五日谈》(Pentamerone)。

影片讲述了住在三个相邻王国的皇室成员的故事，他们分别是一个恋子情结的王后，一个沉迷于女色生性放荡的国王，一个为一只奇异跳蚤所痴迷的君王。

第一个故事中主人公是一位权力至高无上的君主。这位国王(托比·琼斯饰)无心治国理政，却对自己的宠物跳蚤宠爱有加，而它最终长到了一只绵羊的大小。他的女儿维奥拉被宠溺过度，爱慕虚荣。

第二个故事的主人公是不孕女王(萨尔玛·海耶克饰)，对她百依百顺的丈夫(约翰·C·赖利饰演)听从了一位隐士的建议，却在与海兽的搏斗中丧了命。在一间一尘不染的雪白的房间里，女王如愿服用了丈夫用生命换来的血淋淋的心脏，然而，成功产下一子的她却发现，当初为她烹饪心脏的女仆也同时产子。两个男孩同样患有白化病，并且成了形影不离的好朋友。

第三个故事的主人公是一位不务正业的国王，耽于美色的他迷恋上了某日在城堡底下歌唱的女子。该女子其实是一个以染布为生的丑老太婆，她还有一个双胞胎姐妹。在好色国王的盛情邀请之下，双胞胎之一同意与君共度良宵，但条件是私会的全程不得亮灯。一场巨变正在酝酿之中，而双胞胎中的另一个，只能独自面对嫉妒和悔恨。

搜狐影评：因为不像《格林童话》《安徒生童话》那样有传播度，大多数非欧洲观众对影片里的故事不了解，虽然人物与剧情脱胎于十六七世纪欧洲童话，让人有似曾相识的亲切，但更多是新人物新剧情带来的新鲜感。故事中的人物，不管好的坏的，都有种剑走偏锋的荒诞，在任何一部迪斯尼电影中我们都没有见过这样的国王王后王子公主。

所有童话的雏形都是民间故事，而民间故事是最不吝于或赤裸揭露或暗暗讽刺的。导演选择《五日谈》五十个小故事中这三个做改编，是因为它们无比具有现代气息：向往肉欲的男人，为了要孩子无所不用其极的女人，涉及权利的两代人之间冲突等等……马提欧-加洛尼并没有抛弃他最擅长的现实主义表现，无论是前作现实中的寓言元素，还是新作魔幻主义中的现实色彩，都是加洛尼在电影中偏爱虚实结合的典型风格。

主题从一开始就讲的清楚明白：欲望与代价。对生命延续的欲望、性欲、金钱欲和权力欲、占有欲、杀戮欲甚至包括对自由的渴望。每个人的欲望都极其鲜明，似乎因为鲜明而丧失了人性复杂的美。但不要忘了这是一部童话，导演在严格的完成影片的童话感—它必是直观上直接的鲜明的，又让有思考能力的成人结合自身经历，回味无穷的。在这一点上加洛尼做得尤其出色，每一个故事都出人意料但简单易懂，玄妙却藏在故事与故事的勾连中。结尾时所有故事的主人公终于聚到一起，庆祝新女王加冕，所有人抬头看着宫廷杂技演员走在那条悬在高空、燃着火的细钢丝上，所有对非常欲望的追求都犹如踩在这颤颤巍巍的一线间，一旦十足，万劫不复。导演对现实的隐喻乍一显现就戛然而止，剩下的则要在剪辑节奏、情节安排中回味。

就算《故事的故事》的魔幻主义基调不如前作更具现实批判的力量，但加洛尼在视听上做了足够的弥补。从第一个镜头皇家马戏团的出场，既高度还原十七世纪欧洲风貌、又夸张的恰到好处平添魔幻风格的服饰、场景便贯穿影片始终，制作极为精美。王后身上鲜红的斗篷与黑色邪恶的蕾丝花纹、返老还童的少女大红的床单与白嫩的胴体、灰蓝的不透光水底、洁白的餐厅与餐桌上鲜血淋淋的怪物心脏……每一处配色都饱满浓郁到可以拿出来做视觉范例。另外更难想象，片中处处充满童话风格的场景，很多都是实景拍摄，不提起他，仅在技术层面加洛尼在这部作品中，把虚幻与现实的结合做到了极致。

大众影评：1，女王觉得王子不应该跟低贱的下人一起玩耍，甚至为了不让他们在一起而付出了自己的生命，想想也是荒唐可笑，就是这种歧视害死了自己，(至于有些人说什么恋子情结也是醉了，母亲爱自己的孩子有什么奇怪的?她有对王子做出任何奇怪的举动?这根本不是还关注的重点好吗)想想现在的社会，地位歧视，出身歧视，种族歧视……各种歧视还少吗?

2，因为虚荣心欺骗了国王，还因为一句谎言害死了自己的妹妹，最后自己还是老回去了，什么也没得到，还失去了相依为命的人，想想现在的社会，虚荣心还少吗?

3，就因为一个荒唐的考题就把自己的女儿嫁给她不喜欢的人，并且碍于自己国王的面子就算知道事情不妥，还是坚持这样做，(至于养跳蚤，虽然是荒诞了一点，但是有谁规定跳蚤不可以养的?这跳蚤好像从头到尾也没有做过任何伤害别人的事吧，所以这个根本不是什么重点好吗)父母不该过多的干涉儿女的婚姻，想想现在的社会，父母干涉的情况还少吗?

第五篇：关于爱听故事的故事

青岛市黄岛区崇明岛路小学502杨涵琳家长

我总感觉自己对于教育孩子远没有人家那样全力地投入。因为作为父母的文化程度和精力是有限且不一样的，不可能都有相同教育方式和方法，教育成功或失败的结果可以相似，但过程总是千差万别的。就拿我孩子写作文来说吧，最近发现她的作文水平有较大进步，惊喜惊诧之余，我想来想去明白了其个中原因。

原来孩子打小就喜欢听故事，她一有时间就缠着你讲故事。我自己能讲出的几个故事毕竟有限，于是就买来《睡前故事》、《民间故事》、《亲情故事》、《励志故事》等许多故事书来讲给孩子听。故事中优美的语言、典型的人物形象塑造，生动的故事情节，深深的吸引着孩子。当她听到自己感兴趣的故事时，会全神贯注，有身临其境的感觉，她会随着故事中人物的喜怒哀乐而产生情感的共鸣，同情弱者，憎恨恶者。从而培养爱憎分明的情感，树立见义勇为、惩奸除恶的萌芽价值观念。所以只要孩子愿意听你讲故事，就不要使孩子伴着故事入睡的愿望成为了一种奢侈，一定要满足孩子的小小愿望，这也可以看作是与孩子的一种沟通交流的方式。

等孩子上学后，她已经学习掌握了拼音和部分汉字，这时我就给她买带拼音的故事书，并慢慢引导她自己来看这些故事书，我也逐渐地减少给她讲故事的次数。后来她就能自

己看故事书了 ，通过看故事，她认识了许多的汉字和词语，作为孩子这些是在不知不觉中学到的，感到故事有趣才是她爱看故事的动力所在。

随着年级的递升，孩子要学着写作文了，期初我感到她对写作文很是犯愁，总是需要家长的辅导，甚至是抄写作文。自己不会写，就该看看人家是怎么写的，于是我就领孩子逛书店买来几本小学生作文集锦。从此以后每每遇到写作文，总是翻翻人家的进行模仿或是摘抄，我想总比不写强，就把这当成学习的一种方式吧。后来我发现孩子很愿意看这些作文书，原来每一篇小作文原本就是一段小故事，她把这些都当成故事来看了，能不爱看吗?

正是因为爱看故事，在假期里或空闲时间，孩子先后看了《小故事大道理》，《小故事大智慧》、《格林童话全集》、《安徒生童话全集》、《满分作文1000篇》、《全国百家名校新作文》等书籍。有时没书看了她就再看一遍，那个看书的劲头我都倍感意外。有时孩子在说话时说出的词语，我感到很新奇，猜想不是在学校学到的就是可能从读书中学到的。通过读书孩子能够学习借鉴人家的写作技巧和语汇使用方法及文章布局结构等，读书中的积累如小溪般汇集成大河，能使语文写作水平在不知不觉中获得提高。

萧百佑用“三天一顿打”的教育方式，让其三个子女考进了北京大学。我想他的教育方式并不适合所有的孩子，他

的成功说明“狼爸式”教育有他的可取之处，那就是他对于子女教育的思考与付出，为父者对子女教育的这份用心与责任，或许才至为关键，也最为厚重。

“读书破万卷，下笔如有神”。孩子从爱听故事到爱看书，再到会写作文是一个循序渐进的过程，有兴趣才会有动力，强迫孩子做事情一定不会有很理想的效果，循循善诱，因势利导是才是教育孩子的最有效最简单的一种好方式。