倾听的力量ted演讲稿

演讲稿分为多种写作方式，有的是以会议为中心写作，有的是以事情发生为中心写作。在众多的演讲场合中，该怎么写出适合场景的演讲稿呢？以下是小编整理的关于《倾听的力量ted演讲稿》的相关内容，希望能给你带来帮助!

第一篇：倾听的力量ted演讲稿

TED演讲——内向性格的力量

When I was 9 years old, I went off to summer camp for the first time. And my mother packed me a suitcase full of books, which to me seemed like a perfectly natural thing to do, because in my family, reading was the primary group activity. And this might sound antisocial to you, but for us it was really just a different way of being social. You have

about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing. And so I put my books away, back in their suitcase, and I put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer. And I felt kind of guilty about this. I felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they are calling out to me and I was forsaking them, but I did forsake them and I didn‟t open that suitcase again until I was back home with my family at the end of the summer.

Now, I tell you this story about summer camp. I could have told you 50 other just like it, all the time that I got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that I should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert. And I always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were, but for years I denied this intuition, and so I become a Wall Street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that I had always longed to be, partly because I needed to prove myself that I could be bold and assertive too. And I was always going off to crowded bars when I really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends. And I made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that I wasn‟t even aware that I was making them. Now this is what many introverts do, and it‟s our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues‟ loss and our communities‟ loss. And at the risk of sounding grandiose, it is the

world‟s loss, because when it comes to creativity and to leadership, we need introverts doing what they do best. A third to a half of the population is introverts, a third to a half. So that‟s one out of every two or three people you know. So even if you‟re an extrovert yourself, you know I‟ talking about your coworkers and your spouses and your children and the person sitting next to you right now, all of them subject to this bias that is pretty deep and real in our society. We all internalize it from a very early age without even having a language for what we‟re doing.

Now to see the bias clearly you need to understand what introversion is. And it‟s different from being shy. Shyness is about fear of social judgment. Introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation. So extroverts really crave large amounts of stimulation, whereas introverts feel at their most alive and their most switched on and their most capable when they‟re in quiet, more low-key environments. Not all the time, you know these things aren‟t absolute, but a lot of the time.

So the key then to maximizing our talents is for us all to put ourselves in the zone of stimulation that is right for us. But now here‟s where the bias comes in. Our most important institutions, our schools and our workplaces, they are designed mostly for extroverts, and for extroverts‟ need for lots of stimulation. And also we are living through this belief system. We have this belief system right now that I call the new groupthink, which

holds that all creativity and all productivity come from a very oddly gregarious place.

So if you picture the typical classroom nowadays: When I was going to school, we sat in rows. You know, we sat in rows of desks like this, and we did most of our work pretty autonomously, but nowadays, your typical classroom has pods of desks, four or five or six or seven kids all facing each other. And kids are working in countless group assignments. Even in subjects like math and creative writing, which you think, would depend on solo flights of thought. Kids are now expected to act as committee members. And for the kids who prefer to go off by themselves or just to work alone, those kids are seen as outliers often, or worse, as problem cases. And the vast majority of teachers‟ reports believing that the ideal student is an extrovert as opposed to an introvert, even though introverts actually get better grades and are more knowledgeable, according to research.

Okay, same thing is true in our workplaces. We now, most of us work in open plan offices, without walls, where we are subject to the constant noise and gaze of our coworkers. And when it comes to leadership, introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions, even though introverts tend to be very careful, much less likely to take outsize risks, which is something we might all favor nowadays. And interesting research by Adam Grant at the Wharton School has found that introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes than extroverts do, because when they are managing proactive employees, they‟re much more

likely to let those employees run with their ideas, whereas an extrovert can, quite unwittingly, get so excited about things that they‟re putting their own stamp on things, and other people‟s ideas might not as easily then bubble up to the surface.

Now in fact, some of our transformative leaders in history have been introverts. I‟ll give you some examples. Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosa Parks, Gandhi, all these people described themselves as quiet and soft-spoken and even shy. And they all took the spotlight, even though every bone in their bodies was telling them not to. And this turns out to have a special power all its own, because people could feel these leaders were at the helm, not because they enjoyed directing others and not out of the pleasure of being looked at. They were there because they had no choice; because they were driven to do what they thought was right.

Now I think at this point it‟s important for me to say that I actually love extroverts. I always like to say some of my best friends are extrovert including my beloved husband. And we all fall at different points, of course, along the introvert/extrovert spectrum.

Even Carl Jung, the psychologist who first popularized these terms, said that there‟s no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert. He said that such a man would be in a lunatic asylum, if he existed at all. And some people fall smack in the middle of the introvert/extrovert spectrum, and we call these people ambiverts.

And I often think that they have the best of all worlds, but many of us do recognize

ourselves as one type or the other. And what I‟m saying is that culturally we need a much better balance. We need more of a yin and yang between these two types. This is especially important when it comes to creativity and to productivity, because when psychologists look at the lives of the most creative people, what they find are people who are very good at exchanging ideas and advancing ideas, but also have a serious streak of introversion in them. And this is because solitude is a crucial ingredient often to creativity.

So Darwin, he took long walks alone in the woods and emphatically turned down dinner party invitations.

Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss, he dreamed up many of his amazing creations in a lonely bell tower office that he had in the back of his house in La Jolla, California. And he was actually afraid to meet the young children who read his books for fear that they were expecting him this kind of jolly Santa Claus-like figure and would be disappointed with his more reserved persona.

Steve Wozniak invented the first Apple computer sitting alone in his cubical in Hewlett-Packard where he was working at the time. And he says that he never would have become such an expert in the first place had he not been too introverted to leave the house when he was growing up. Now of course, this does not mean that we should all stop collaborating, and case in

point is Steve Wozniak famously coming together with Steve Jobs to start Apple Computer, but it does mean that solitude matters and that for some people it is the air that they breathe. And in the fact, we have known for centuries about the transcendent power of solitude. It‟s only recently that we‟ve strangely begun to forget it. If you look at most of the world‟s major religions, you will find seekers, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad, seeders who are going off by themselves alone to the wilderness where they then have profound epiphanies and revelations that they then bring back to the rest of the community. So no wildness, no revelations.

This is no surprise though if you look at the insights of contemporary psychology. It turns out that we can‟t even be in a group of people without instinctively mirroring, mimicking their opinions. Even about seemingly personal and visceral things like which you‟re attracted to, you will start aping the beliefs of the people around you without even realizing that that‟s what you‟re doing. And groups famously follow the opinions of the most dominant or charismatic person in the room, even though there‟s zero correlation between being the best talker and having the best ideas, I mean zero. So……

You might be following the person with the best ideas, but you might not. And do you really want to leave it up to chance? Much better for everybody to go off by themselves, generate their own ideas freed from the distortions of group dynamics, and then come

together as a team to talk them through in a well-managed environment and take it from there.

Now if all this is true, then why are we getting it so wrong? Why are we setting up our schools this way and our workplaces? And why are we making these introverts feel so guilty about wanting to just go off by themselves some of the time?

One answer lies deep in our cultural history. Western societies, and in particular the U.S., have always favored the man of action over the man of contemplation and “man” of contemplation, but in America‟s early days, we lived in what historians call a culture of character, where we still, at that point, valued people for their inner selves and their moral rectitude. And if you look at the self-help books from this era, they all had titles with things like “Character, the Grandest Thing in the World.” And they featured role models like Abraham Lincoln who was praised for being modest and unassuming. Ralph Waldo Emerson called him” A man who does not offend by superiority.”

But then we hit the 20th century and we entered a new culture that historians call the culture of personality. What happened is we had evolved an agricultural economy to a world of big business. And so suddenly people are moving from small towns to the cities. And instead of working alongside people they‟ve known all their lives, now they are having to prove themselves in a crowd of strangers. So, quite understandably, qualities like magnetism

and charisma suddenly come to seem really important. And sure enough, the self-help books change to meet these new needs and they start to have names like “how to win friends and influence people”. And they feature as their role models really great salesmen. So that‟s the world we„re living in today. That‟s our cultural inheritance.

Now none of this is to say that social skills are unimportant, and I‟m also not calling for the abolishing of teamwork at all. The same religions who send their sages off to lonely mountain tops also teach us love and trust. And the problems that we are facing today in fields like science and in economics are so vast and so complex that we are going to need armies of people coming together to solve them working together. But I am saying that the more freedom that we give introverts to be themselves, the more likely that they are to come up with their own unique solutions to these problems.

So now I‟d like to share with you what‟s in my suitcase today. Guess what? Books. I have a suitcase full of books. Here‟s Margaret Atwood, “Cat‟s Eye.” Here‟s a novel by Milan Kundera. And here‟s” the guide for the perplexed” by Maimonides.

But these are not exactly my books. I brought these books with me because they were written by my grandfather‟s favorite authors.

My grandfather was a rabbi and he was a widower, who lived alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn that was my favorite place in the world when I was growing up,

partly because it was filled with his very gentle, very courtly presence and partly because it was filled with books. I mean literally every table; every chair in his apartment had yielded its original function to now serve as a surface for swaying stacks of books. Just like the rest of my family, my grandfather‟s favorite thing to do in the whole world was to read. But he also loved his congregation, and you could feel this love in the sermons that he gave every week for the 62 years that he was a rabbi. He would take the fruits of each week‟s reading and he would weave these intricate tapestries of ancient and humanist thought. And people would come from all over to hear him speak.

But here‟s the thing about my grandfather. Underneath this ceremonial role, he was really modest and really introverted, so much so that when he delivered these sermons, he had trouble making eye contact with the very same congregation that he had been speaking to for 62 years. And even away from the podium, when you called him to say hello, he would often end the conversation prematurely for fear that he was taking up too much of your time. But when he died at the age of 94, the police had to close down the streets of his neighborhood to accommodate the crowd of people who came out to mourn him.

And so these days I try to learn from my grand father‟s example in my own way. So I just published a book about introversion, and it took me about 7 years to write. And for me, that seven years was like total bliss, because I was reading, I was writing, I was

thinking, I was researching. It was my version of my grandfather‟s hours of the day alone in his library.

But now all of a sudden my job is very different, and my job is to be out here talking about it, talking about introversion. And that‟s a lot harder for me, because as honored as I am to be here with all of you right now, this is not my natural milieu. So I prepared for moments like these as best I could. I spent the last year practicing public speaking every chance I could get. And I call this my “year of speaking dangerously.” And that actually helped a lot.

But I‟ll tell you, what helps even more is my sense, my belief, my hope that when it comes to our attitudes to introversion and to quiet and to solitude, we truly are poised on the brink on dramatic change. I mean, we are. And so I am going to leave you now with three calls for action for those who share this vision.

No.1, stop the madness for constant group works. Just stop it. And I want to be clear about what I‟m saying, because I deeply believe our offices should be encouraging casual, chatty café-style types of interactions, you know, the kind where people come together and serendipitously have an exchange of ideas. That is great. It‟s great for introverts and it‟s great for extroverts. But we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work. School, same thing. We need to be teaching kids to work together, for sure,

but we also need to be teaching them how to work on their own. This is especially important for extroverted children too. They need to work on their own because that is where deep thought comes from in part.

Okay, no.2, go to the wilderness. Be like Buddha, have your own revelations. I‟m not saying that we all have to now go off and build our own cabins in the woods and never talk to each other again, but I am saying that we could all stand to unplug and get inside our own heads a little more often.

No.3, take a good look at what‟s inside your own suitcase and why you put it there. So extroverts, maybe your suitcases are also full of books. Or maybe they‟re full of champagne glasses or skydiving equipment. Whatever it is, I hope you take these things out every chance you get and grace us with your energy and your joy. But introverts, you being you, you probably have the impulse to guard very carefully what‟s inside your own suitcase. And that‟s okay. But occasionally, just occasionally, I hope you will open up your suitcases for other people to see, because the world needs you and in needs the things you carry.

So I wish you the best of all possible journeys and the courage to speak softly. Thank you very much.

第二篇：倾听的力量

熊浩

我们在一个沟通的，我们的舆论环境氛围，包括我们正在录制的这档节目我是演说家，都在鼓励人们说话。孟金辉导演在他著名的话剧《恋爱的犀牛》当中有这样一句经典台词，他说如果你爱一个人10分，但却只能表达一分，倒不如啊你爱一个人一分，却能表达10分。说话之道，是我们这个时代的高频词汇，也是我想在座的每一位，我们都想具备的特殊技能。

我在大学当中教授冲突解决，我帮助法院、医院、律所、企业解决各种各样问题，不同类型的纠纷。冲突见的多了/我有一个非常有趣的表现，那就是很多本可以管控良好的冲突，很多本可以处理妥当的矛盾之所以最后爆发，其实是因为一些极为琐碎的原因，这其中最常见的就是我们好爱讲但我们不愿意听。 哈佛大学的法学院的教授举过这样一个具有引喻意味的故事，他说，我们设想一下我们是两个孩子的父母亲,有一天你拖着疲惫的身躯回到家中，你推开门发现两个孩子正在争抢一只橘子,你会怎么做?作为法律人让我们把这个故事的细节勾勒的更加精准细腻，首先第一，你只有一只橘子，你不能从后面拿出一堆橘子说，没关系爸爸是种橘子的，这不行。因为这个冲突的本质是资源的有限，橘子的唯一，如果你有很多橘子本质上就没这个冲突，也就无所谓冲突的解决。第二两个孩子当然都是亲生的，在这个前提下，你会怎么办?

大家可以用自己直觉快速的有一个答案，我大概会听到这样的几种：第一种哥哥应该让弟弟，因为所谓长幼有序;另外一些人会说弟弟应该让哥哥，因为孔融让梨;我打赌，在座的各位，你们第一反应最快直觉是从中间掰开一人一半，这是一个看上去多像正确答案的答案。我们看看教授怎么说，哥哥拿走他的一半吃掉橘肉扔掉橘皮很正常，弟弟恰好相反，弟弟的做法是扔掉橘肉而留下橘皮。为什么?因为他需要烤蛋糕，大家知道，陈皮其实是西点烘焙当中常见的一种香料。

各位，刚才我所讲的如果不是一个故事，而是一个电影，我们回转、放映、定格，我们回到你分橘子前的那一瞬间我不知道在座各位有没有一点点感觉，就是你大概少做了一个动作，你让一半的资源被浪费，因为本来哥哥可以拿到一整只橘肉，而弟弟可以获得一整片橘皮，那个你漏掉的动作就是听。我们每个人都会听，但是要把听放到判断了解认知之前，这是一种需要特别学习的修行。

我们通常说我们是在沟通的时代，the age of communication，但是以我浅白的观察，不是的，我们是在一个balabala演说的时代，我们太多人说话我们不大有听。美国的数据，他说现在美国的年轻人每天呢利用互联网向外发出100条以上的资讯，我们随时随刻要和这个世界保持联系，我们每分每秒都想发表我们的演说，但他们跟父母的互动在减少，更少的去聆听别人的意见。

当我们这个时代单一的强调说，鼓励说，我不是说有错，我说这个当中没有实现听与说的平衡，过分只强调说/我们将会变的越来越偏执。理由非常简单，因为当我说话的时候就像此际，我其实在强化既有的认知，各位听的时候/是在张开你的耳朵试图聆听不一样的经验。更何况大家如果留意中国的互联网生态，我们一语不合，我们恶语相向。因为越激烈的言词才能显示立场，越过分的声音才能引发围观，只强调说，而忽略听，我们可能越来越极端/而失去真相。

美国有一个有趣的访谈节目，它的主要内容啊就是主持人访谈一群小孩子，有一次主持人问小孩子一个问题说大家将来想做什么，其中一个小朋友举手说我想开飞机我想做飞行员，主持人说恩史密斯。那我问你一个有挑战性的问题，假如有一天你开着飞机飞到大洋之上/没汽油了,你会怎么办?孩子说，我我我会让我所有乘客都系好安全带，然后我自己背好降落伞包/赶紧跳下去，我……他还想说他没说下去，因为他的言词已经被/大人们笑声打断了，大人们自以为是的认为，你看，人性当中的恶连天真都包不住。(崩豆一样)

主持人没有，主持人/仍然听，他好奇，他好奇说孩子为什么会这样想，当孩子发现他被聆听鼓励，孩子才有可能继续说/他说我要从飞机上跳下去/然后我要找到汽油然后赶紧飞回来拯救所有的乘客。没有人再笑了，我们的自以为是/让我们差点误会这孩子，我们以为发现了恶，殊不知那是被太阳萃练过的/童真的至善、善良。

当我们在强调听的价值，我们在说我们每一个人声音、观念、阅历、体验都可以平等地被表达;当我们在强调听的观念，我们是在说，你的话，我有雅量，我有耐心、我有责任让你讲完;当我们再强调听的观念我们绝不只是讲沟通当中的微小技术，我们是让大家回忆在人类历史上最闪光的价值观，他们是平等、宽容，以及对自以为是的节制。

我来到演说家这个舞台，我没有特别动人和夸张的故事我只想给你传达一些重要但微小的观念，并呼吁大家和我们一起恢复听的习惯，一起来养育听的品德。因为只有这样我们人和人之间的沟通才有可能平和、开朗、通透，只有这样你们/才能发现那个橘子背后/孩子真实的诉求，也只有这样/我们才能骄傲的说，真的，我们占据在一个叫沟通的/大时代。谢谢各位。

第三篇：正A6熊浩倾听的力量

倾听的力量 熊浩

我们在一个沟通的时代，我们的舆论环境氛围，包括我们正在录制的这档节目《我是演说家》，都在鼓励人们说话。孟京辉导演在他著名的话剧《恋爱的犀牛》当中有这样一句经典台词，他说“如果你爱一个人十分但却只能表达一分，倒不如啊你爱一个人一分，但却能够表达十分。”“说话之道”是我们这个时代的高频词汇，也是我想在座的每一位，我们都想具备的特殊技能。

我在大学当中教授冲突解决，我帮助法院、医院、律所、企业解决各种各样问题、不同类型纠纷。冲突见的多了我有一个非常有趣的发现，那就是很多本可以管控良好的冲突、很多本可以处理妥当的矛盾之所以最后爆发，其实是因为一些极为琐碎的原因，这其中最常见的就是我们好爱讲，但我们不愿意听。哈佛大学法学院的教授William·Ury(威廉·尤里)在他的代表作《Getting To Yes(谈判力 )》中举过这样一个具有隐喻意味的故事。他说，我们设想一下我们是两个孩子的父母亲，有一天你拖着疲惫的身躯回到家中，你推开门发现两个孩子正在争抢一只橘子，你会怎么做?作为法律人，让我们把这个故事的细节勾勒得更加精准细腻。首先，第一你只有一只橘子，你不能从后面拿出一堆橘子说“没关系爸爸是种橘子的”，这不行，因为这个冲突的本质是资源的有限橘子的唯一。如果你有很多橘子本质上就没有这个冲突，也就无所谓冲突的解决。第二，两个孩子当然都是亲生的。在这个前提下你会怎么办?大家可以用自己的直觉快速的有一个答案。我大概会听到这样的几种：第一种，哥哥应该让弟弟，因为所谓长幼有序。但另外一些人会说，弟弟应该让哥哥，因为孔融让梨。我打赌在座的各位你们的第一反应最快直觉是从中间剖开一人一半，这是一个看上去多像正确答案的答案。我们看看教授怎么说，Ury说，哥哥拿走他的一半，吃掉橘肉扔掉橘皮很正常。弟弟恰好相反，弟弟的做法是扔掉橘肉而留下橘皮。为什么?因为他需要烤蛋糕。大家知道，陈皮其实是西点烘焙当中一种常见的香料。各位，刚才我所讲的如果不是一个故事而是一个电影，我们回转、放映、定格，我们回到你分橘子前的那一瞬间，我不知道在座的各位有没有一点点感觉，那就是你大概少做了一个动作，你让一半的资源被浪费。因为本来哥哥可以拿到一整只橘肉，而弟弟可以获得一整片橘皮。那个你漏掉的动作就是听。

我们每个人都会听，但是要把听放到判断、了解、认知之前，这是一种需要特别学习的修行。我们通常说我们是在一个沟通的时代The age of communication，但是以我浅白的观察，不是的，我们是在一个“吧啦吧啦”言说的时代。我们大多人说话，我们不大有听。美国的数据，它说现在美国的年轻人每天要利用互联网向外发出一百条以上的资讯，我们随时随刻要和这个世界保持联系，我们每分每秒都想发表我们的言说，但他们跟父母的互动在减少，更少的去聆听别人的意见。当我们这个时代单一的强调说、鼓励说，我不是说有错，我是说如果这个当中没有实现听与说的平衡，过分地只强调说，我们将会变得越来越偏执。理由非常简单，因为当我说话的时候，就像此际，我其实是在强调我的既有认知，而各位在听的时候，是在张开你的耳朵试图聆听不一样的经验。更何况大家如果留意中国的互联网生态，我们一语不合、我们恶语相向。因为越激烈的言辞才能显示立场，越过分的声音才能引发围观。只强调说而忽略听，我们可能越来越极端而失去真相。美国有一个有趣的访谈节目，它的主要内容就是主持人访谈一群小孩子。有一次主持人问小孩子一个问题，说：“大家将来想做什么?”其中一个小朋友举手说：“我想开飞机，我想做飞行员。”主持人说：“嗯，史密斯，那我问你一个有挑战性的问题。假如有一天你开着飞机，飞到大洋之上没汽油了，你会怎么办。”孩子说：“我…我会让我所有的乘客都系好安全带，而我自己背好降落伞包，赶紧跳下去，我…”他还想说，他没说下去，因为他的言辞已经被大人们的笑声打断了。大人们自以为是的认为，你看，人性当中的恶连天真都包不住。主持人没有，主持人仍然听，他好奇，他好奇说孩子为什么会这样想。当孩子发现他被聆听鼓励，孩子才有可能继续说。他说：“我要从飞机上跳下去，我要找到汽油然后赶紧飞回来，拯救所有的乘客。”没有人再笑了。我们的自以为是，让我们差点误会这个孩子。我们以为我们发现了恶，殊不知那是被太阳淬炼过的童真的至善、善良。

当我们在强调听的价值观，我们是在说我们每一个人的声音、观念、阅历、体验，都可以平等地被表达;当我们在强调听的观念，我们是在说，你的话我有雅量、我有耐心、我有责任让你讲完;当我们在强调听的观念，我们绝不是只是讲沟通当中的微小技术，我们是在让大家回忆那些在人类历史上最闪光的价值观，它们是平等、宽容以及对自以为是地节制。

我来到演说家这个舞台，我没有特别动人和夸张的故事，我只想给你传达一些重要但微小的观念，并呼吁大家和我一起来恢复听的习惯、一起来养育听的品德。因为只有这样，我们人和人之间的沟通才有可能平和、开朗、通透，只有这样你们才能发现，那个橘子背后孩子真实的诉求，也只有这样我们才能骄傲地说，真的，我们占据在一个叫“沟通”的大时代。

第四篇：TED演讲：成功的秘诀

成功的钥匙

When I was 27 years old, I left a very demanding job in management consulting, for a job that was even more demanding: teaching. I went to teach seventh grades math in the New York City public schools. And like any teacher, I made quizzes and tests, i gave out homework assignments. When the work came back, I calculated grades. What struck me was that I.Q. was not the only difference between my best and my worst students, some of my strongest performers did not have stratospheric I.Q. Scores, some of my smartest kids weren’t doing so well. And that got me thinking, the kinds of things you need to learn in seventh grade math, sure, they’re hard: ratios, decimals, the area of a parallelogram, but these concepts are not impossible. And I was firmly convinced that every one of my students could learn material if they worked hard and long enough。

在我27岁的时候，我辞去了一份非常有挑战性的职业-企业管理咨询，转而投入了一份更加具有挑战性的职业：教育。我来到纽约的一些公立学校教七年级学生数学，和别的老师一样，我会给同学们做小测试和考试，我会给他们布置家庭作业。当这些试卷和作业收上来之后，我计算了他们的成绩，让我震惊的是，I.Q的高低并不是我最好的和最差的学生之间唯一的差别，一些在课业上表现很好的学生并不具有非常高的IQ分数， 一些聪明的孩子反而在课业上表现的不那么尽如人意，这引起了我的思考。当然，学生们在七年级需要学习的东西，是有难度的，像比率，小数，平行四边形的面积计算，但是这些概念是完全可以掌握的，我坚信我的每一位学生都可以学会教材内容，只要他们肯花时间和精力的话。

After several more years of teaching, I came to the conclusion that what we need in education is a much better understanding of students and learning from a motivational perspective, from a psychological perspective. In education, the one thing we know how to measure best is I.Q., but what if doing well in school and in life, depends on much more than your ability to learn quickly and easily? So I left classroom, and I went to graduate school to become a psychologist. I started studying kids and adults in all kinds of super challenging settings, and in every study my question was who is successful here and why. My research team and I went to West Point Military Academy, we try to predict which cadets would stay in military training and which would drop out. We went to the National Spelling Bee, and tried to predict which children would advance farthest in competition. We studied rookie teachers in really tough neighborhoods, asking which teachers are still going to be here in teaching by the end of the school year. And of those, who will be the most effective at improving learning outcomes for their students. We partnered with private companies, asking which of these salespeople is going to keep their jobs, and who’s going to earn the most money? 经过几年教学之后，我得出一个结论，我们在教育方面需要做的是从学习动力的角度和心理学的角度对学生和学习行为，进行一次更为深刻的理解。在教育系统中，我们都知道评价优秀学生的标准就是IQ，但如果在学校和生活中的优秀表现远不仅仅依赖于你轻松高效的学习能力呢?所以我离开了讲台，回到学校继续心理学硕士学位。我开始研究，孩子和大人在各种具有挑战性的情况下以及在各项研究中，我的问题是谁才是成功者，为什么他们会成功?我和我的研究团队前往西点军校展开调研，我们试图预测哪些学员能够耐得住军队的训练，哪些会被淘汰出局。我们前去观摩全国拼字比赛，同时也试着预测哪些孩子会晋级到最后的比赛。我们研究，在恶劣的环境下工作的，刚入行的老师，询问他们哪些老师会在学年结束后继续留下来任教。以及他们之中谁能最快地提高学生的学习成绩。我们与私企合作，向他们询问哪些销售人员可以保住工作，哪些赚钱更多?

In all those very different contexts, one characteristic emerged, as a significant predictor of success, and it wasn’t social intelligence, it wasn’t good looks, physical health, and it wasn’t I.Q., it was grit. Grit is passion and perseverance for very long-term goals. Grit is having stamina, grit is sticking with your future, day in, day out. Not just for the week, not just for the month, but for years and working really hard to make that future a reality. Grit is living life like it’s a marathon, not a sprint. A few years ago, I started studying grit in the Chicago public schools. I asked thousands of high school junior to take grit questionnaires, and then waited around more than a year to see who would graduate, turns out that grittier kids were significantly more likely to graduate, even when I matched them on every characteristic I could measure, things like family incomes, standardized achievement test scores, even how safe kids felt when they were at school. So it’s not just at West Point or the National Spelling Bee that grit matters, it’s also in school, especially for kids at risk for dropping out. To me, the most shocking thing about grit is how little we know, how little science knows about building it. 在所有那些不同的环境下，一种性格特征凸显了出来，这种特征很大程度上预示了成功，而且他并不是社交智力，不是漂亮的外表，强健的体魄，也不是很高的I.Q.，它是毅力。毅力是对长远目标的激情和坚持，毅力是拥有持久的恒劲，毅力是你对未来的坚持，日复一日，不是仅仅持续一个星期或者一个月，而是几年甚至几十年努力奋斗着，让自己的梦想变为现实。毅力把生活当成一场马拉松而不是一场短跑。几年前，在芝加哥的公立学校里开始研究毅力，我对上千名初中生进行了关于毅力的问卷调查，然后等候了一年多来看最终哪些学生能毕业结果证明那些更具毅力的学生在毕业的概率上占绝对优势，即使是在同样可以量化的外在因素下，像家庭收入，标准化成绩测验的分数，甚至是孩子们在学校能获得多少安全感之类，仍是有毅力的学生更容易毕业，所有不仅仅是在西点军校里或者全国拼字比赛上才需要毅力，在学校亦是如此，尤其是对于那些徘徊在辍学边缘的孩子们。对我来说，关于毅力最让我震惊的事情莫过于对于毅力，我们知之甚少，在培养毅力上，科学对理解的认识又是何等贫乏。

Every day, parents and teachers ask me “how do i build grit in kids?” What do I do to teach kids a solid work ethic, how do i keep them motivated for the long run? The honest answer is, I don’t know. What I do know is that talent doesn’t make you gritty. Our data show very clearly that there are many talented individuals who simply do not follow through on their commitments. In fact, in our data, grit is usually unrelated, or even inversely related to measure of talent. So far, the best idea I’ve heard about building grit in kids is something called “growth mindset”. This is an idea developed at Stanford University by Carol Dweck, and it is the belief that the ability to learn is not fixed, that it can change with your effort , Dr. Dweck has shown that when kids read and learn about the brain and how it changes and grows in response to challenge, they’re much more likely to persevere when they fail, because they don’t believe that failure is a permanent condition. So growth mindset is a great idea for building grit, but we need more, and that’s where I’m going to end my remarks, because that’s where we are, that’s the work that stands before us.We need to take our best ideas, our strongest intuitions, and we need to test them. We need to measure whether we’ve been successful, and we have to be willing to fail, to be wrong, to start over again with lessons learned. In other words, we need to be gritty about getting our kids grittier. Thank you!

每天都有家长和老师来问我“我怎样做才能培养孩子的毅力呢”该做些什么才能教授给孩子们真正的职业道德，我又该怎样调动他们长期的积极性呢?老实说，我不知道。我所知道的是，才华并不能使你坚韧不拔，我们的数据十分清楚的表明，有许多才华横溢的人，他们都无法坚持兑现自己的承诺。事实上，根据我们的数据来看，毅力通常与其他因素无关，甚至与才华的衡量标准背道而驰。到目前为止，我所听说过得在孩子身上培养坚忍品质最有效的方法，叫“成长型思维模式”。斯坦福大学卡洛杜威克提出过一个观点，他相信人的学习能力是可变的，他随着你的努力程度而变化。杜威克教授表示，当孩子们阅读和学习有关大脑的知识，以及它在面对挑战时所发生的变化和成长情况，他们失败之后更容易坚持下去，因为他们不相信一直失败下去，因此，成长性思维模式对培养毅力大有裨益。但是我们需要更多，我决定在次结束我的评论，因为我们正在经历这一切，这是眼前所面临的工作，我们要拿出最好的想法和最强的直觉。我们要对他们进行实践，我们需要估量这一切是否成功，同时还要渴望面对失败和错误，要从这些失败中汲取教训经验重新再来，换句话说，我们只有自己变得更加有毅力才能让我们的孩子变得更有毅力，谢谢大家。

第五篇：TED演讲中的句子

1. [谈对人生的热情]

It was an achievement worthy of Mahatma Gandhi, conducted with the shrewdness of a lawyer and the idealism of a saint.

他带来的效应堪比圣雄甘地，兼具律师的机智和圣贤的理想主义。

―It’s okay. It was all so beautiful. Whenever you hear this, I will be there.‖

情况没你想得那么糟，世界多么美好!每当你听到这首曲子的时候，我都在你的身边。

The secret of their extraordinary success lay precisely in that insatiable curiosity, that irrepressible desire to know, no matter what the subject and no matter what the cost. 他们取得非凡成就的秘密，是他们永不满足的好奇心和难以遏制的求知欲，以及对任何事物不计代价的付出。

―Live each day as if it is your last,‖ (Gandhi) ―learn as if you’ll live forever.‖ This is what I’m passionate about. It is this inextinguishable, undaunted appetite for learning and experience; no matter how risible, no matter how esoteric, no matter how seditious it might seem. 要活就要像明天你就会死去一样活着(甘地)，要学习就要像你将会永生一样学习。这就是我的热情所在，一种对知识和经验的坚定无畏的渴望，而不管这些知识多么荒唐，抑或神秘，或看上去别有用心。

2. [安静!保持听力健康的八大法则]

Each of you an individual chord, for one definition of health may be that chord is in complete harmony.

每个人都是一个独立的和弦。健康的定义之一是令这种和弦保持一种和谐状态。

Reductive listening is to reduce everything down to what’s relevant, and discard everything that’s not relevant. (men) 删减性的倾听是有选择的听，只关注想知道的东西而忽略无关紧要的内容(通常男士)。

Expansive listening – get no destination in mind. It’s just enjoying the journey (women typically). 扩展性的倾听——无明确目标的倾听，只是享受听的过程(通常女士)。

Three quick tips to protect your ears: 三种保护听力的简单方法： ① Professional hearing protectors 专业听力保护器

② Headphones of the best kind you can afford 买你能买得起的最好耳机

③ When in bad sound, put your fingers in your ears or just move away from it. 听到噪音时，最好用手指护住耳朵，或者远离噪音;

Language as decorated silence. 语言即经修饰过的宁静。

1 Wind, water, birds – natural sound – all very healthy because all of it that we evolved to over the years.风声，水声，鸟声——大自然的声音对健康很有好处，因为这些都是我们进化过程中陪伴我们的语言。

To design soundscapes just like words of art, that has a foreground, a background, all in beautiful proportion.

去设计如艺术品一般的声音氛围，有前景，有背景，并且比例协调。

Just listen to the music is good for you, if it’s music made with good intention, made with love, generally.

听音乐也好，只要它的创作动机是好的，是有爱的音乐就可以。

3. [从机器人那里学来的四课]

– Always question assumptions. 总是质疑―想当然‖的结论。

– When in doubt, improvise. 纠结时，即兴来。

– When your path is blocked, pivot. 前路受阻时，围绕中心迂回前进。

– Practice, practice, practice (if you want to do it well) 没有什么能替代实践，实践，再实践。

Many of our technological innovations, the devices we dream about, can inspire us to be better humans.

我们有许多技术革新，和正在研发的设备可以激励我们变得更好。

Little things, done right, matter.

无论多小的事情，做对了就会有大用。

Well-designed moments can build brands. 精心设计的细节很容易产生品牌效应。

4. [你为何不会成就伟业]

Passion is the thing that will help you create the highest expression of your talent. 能帮助你成就自己才华的最好的一样东西，就是热忱。

You really think it’s appropriate that you should actually take children and use them as a shield? 你真的以为拿小孩当挡箭牌合适吗?

5. [温和的成功哲学]

For good or for ill, we generate these incredible stories about the world around us, and then the world turns around and astonishes us.

2 无论好坏，我们创造了关于周遭世界的绝妙故事，而世界也转过身来，令我们大吃一惊。 A snob is anybody who takes a small part of you and uses that to come to a complete vision of who you are.

势利的人以一小部分的你来判别你的全部价值。

I don’t think we are particularly materialistic. I think we live in a society which has simply pegged certain emotional rewards to the acquisition of material goods. It’s not the material goods we want, it’s the rewards we want. And that’s a new way of looking at luxury goods. The next time you see somebody driving a Ferrari, don’t think ―This is somebody who is greedy‖, think ―this is somebody who is incredibly vulnerable and in need of love.‖ In other words, feel sympathy, rather than contempt.

我并不认为我们特别看重物质，而是生活在一个物质能带来大量情感反馈的时代。我们想要的不是物质，而是背后的情感反馈。这赋予奢侈品一个崭新的含意。下次你看到那些开着法拉利跑车的人，不要去想―这个人很贪婪‖，而应想：―这是一个无比脆弱且渴望爱的人。‖也就是说，同情他们，不要鄙视他们。

The closer two people are, in age, in background, in the process of identification, the more there is a danger of envy.

越是两个年龄背景相近的人，越容易陷入嫉妒的苦海。

(What do you do?) And according to how you answer that question, people are either incredibly delighted to see you, or look at their watch and make their excuses.

(你做什么工作?)你对这个问题的答案，将决定对方接下来的反应。对方可能表示深感荣幸认识你，或是开始看表，然后想个借口离开。

Most people make a strict correlation between how much time and if you like, love – not romantic love, though that may be something – but love in general, respect they are willing to accord us, that will be strictly defined by our position in the social hierarchy.

大部分世人决定要花费多少时间给予多少爱(不一定是浪漫的爱情，虽然那也包括在内)他们所愿意给我们的关爱，尊重取决于我们的社会地位。

The idea that we will make a society where literally everybody is graded, the good at the top, and the bad at the bottom, and it’s exactly done as it should be, is impossible. There are simply too many random factors; we’ll never get to grade them. Hold your horses when you’re coming to judge people. You don’t necessarily know someone’s true value is. That’s an unknown part of them.

那种能创造出一个好人在上，坏人在下，中无任何差错的社会的观点，是不现实的。这世上有太多偶然的契机，我们却无从将这些因素分级。在开口评论他人之前，请千万三思而后行。你很有可能不知道他人的真正价值，那是他人的不可测部分。

You cannot be successful at everything. So any vision of success has to admit what it’s losing out on, where the element of loss is. 你不可能在所有事情上都成功，所有成功实例必须承认它们同时也失去了一些东西，放弃了一些东西。

3 There is going to be an element where we are not succeeding. It’s bad enough not getting what we want, but it’s even worse to have an idea of what it is you want and find out at the end of a journey that it isn’t, in fact, what you wanted all along.

总是有些什么是我们得不到的。得不到自己想要的已经够糟糕了，更糟糕的是，在你人生旅程的终点，发觉你所追求的，从来不是你真正想要的。

6. [精神病测试的另类答案]

He decided to fake madness to get out of a prison sentence. 他决定装疯，以此逃过牢狱之灾。

Capitalism, perhaps at its most remorseless, is a physical manifestation of psychopathy. 冷酷无情的资本主义正是精神疾病的物质表现。

So I changed tack. 于是我改变了策略。

7. [音乐的力量]

The most miserable and tragic thing about poverty is not the lack of bread or roof, but the feeling of being no-one, the feeling of not being anyone, the lack of identification, the lack of public esteem. 关于贫穷最可怜和最悲惨的事情，并不是没有面包可吃，没有房子可住，而是根本没有自我意识，缺乏存在感，缺乏自我认同，不被公众尊重。

I have come to know the mutability of all human relations and have learned to isolate myself from heat and cold so that the temperature balance is fairly well assured. –Elbert Einstein 我已熟悉一切人际关系的变幻无常，也学会漠视这种世态炎凉，以保证我的心态平衡。——爱因斯坦

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. –the Golden Rule 你们愿意人怎样对待你们，你们也要怎样待人。——耶稣的黄金法则

The road to success is lined with many tempting parking spaces. 通向成功的路旁充斥着许多诱人的休息区。

It’s going to be a society that’s way in advance of our own. We’re not inevitably doomed to self-destruction.

一定存在一个比我们的社会先进很多的另一个社会，我们并不是不可避免地走向自我毁灭。

8. [我们真的需要月亮吗?] When the Earth is spinning very fast, it was very stable. But as it slows down, it will be lose its stability and start to wobble had it not been for the moon.

地球在快速转动时，状态十分稳定。但它放慢速度后就会失去稳定性，开始晃动。如果没有 4 月亮，情况就会是这样。

The angle of earth’s spin is constant only because the moon’s gravitational pull. 地球的自转角度能够保持不变，完全是因为有了月球的引力拉动。

We piece together the fragment of memory to create the idea of future. 我们靠收集记忆碎片去创造未来的想象。

It seems that a lot of unconscious brain activities going on that are shaping on your decision, and your consciousness comes in very late stage of the decisions.

似乎有大量的无意识大脑活动在塑造你的决定，而你的意识在决定中表现得很滞后。

9. [如何实现生活与工作的平衡]

And the reality of the society that we’re in is there are thousands and thousands of people out there leading lives of quiet, screaming desperation, where they work long hard hours at jobs they hate to enable them to buy things they don’t need to impress people they don’t like. 现实社会的情况是：成千上万的人们都在平静的绝望中煎熬。他们夜以继日地从事他们痛恨的职业，目的是为了购买无用的商品，以博得无关痛痒的邻人的艳羡。

If you don’t design your life, someone else will design it for you, and you may just not like their idea of balance. –To take control and responsibility for the type of lives that we want to lead by ourselves. 如果你不规划自己的生活，那么别人就会为你规划，而他们对平衡的处理，你往往并不认同。所以，要自己承担起选择自己生活轨迹的重任。

10. [美妙生活的三个秘诀]

Living with a sense of awareness of the world around you. 主动感知你周遭的世界

Embracing your inner three year-old and seeing the tiny joys that make life so sweet. 拥抱内心中那个三岁的自己，意识到让生活美好的那些小小快乐。

Being authentic to yourself-being you and being cool with that. 做真实的自己，心安理得做自己。

Letting your heart lead you and putting yourself in experiences that satisfy you. 顺从自己的心意，让自己置身于能让你快乐的事务中。