我存在的ted演讲稿

演讲稿具有总结性与实用性的特点，是一种观点明确的书面材料。演讲稿是以生活为中心，如何根据生活中的感悟，写出一份有意义的演讲稿呢？以下是小编整理的关于《我存在的ted演讲稿》，欢迎阅读，希望大家能够喜欢。

第一篇：我存在的ted演讲稿

ted演讲稿脆弱的力量

欢迎来到聘才网，以下是聘才小编为大家搜索整理的，欢迎大家阅读。 ted演讲稿脆弱的力量

那我就这么开始吧：几年前，一个为我讲演活动的策划人打电话给我，她在电话里说：“我真很苦恼该如何在宣传单上介绍你”。我心想，这有什么苦恼呢?

她继续道：“你看，我听过你的演讲，我觉得我可以称你为研究者。可我担心的是，如果我这么称呼你，没人会来听，因为大家普遍认为研究员是很无趣而且脱离现实。”这说的很对。然后她说：“但是我非常喜欢你的演讲，你的讲演就跟讲故事一样很吸引人。我想来想去，还是觉得称你为讲故事的人比较妥当”。而那个做学术的、感到不安的我脱口而出道：“你要叫我什么?”她说：“我要称你为讲故事的人。”我心想：“为什么不干脆叫魔法小精灵?”我说：“让我考虑一下。”

我试着鼓起勇气。我对自己说，我是一个讲故事的人。我是一个从事定性研究的科研人员。我收集故事，这就是我的工作。或许故事就是有灵魂的数据。或许我就是一个讲故事的人。于是我说：“听着，要不你就称我为做研究兼讲故事的人。”她大笑着说：”哈哈，没这么个说法呀。“

所以我是个做研究兼讲故事的人，我今天想跟大家谈论的：我们要谈论的话题是关于拓展认知。我想给你们讲几个故事是关于我的一份研究工作，这份研究从本质上拓宽了我个人的认知，也确确实实改变了我生活、爱、工作还有教育孩子的方式。我的故事从这里开始：当我还是个年轻的博士研究生的时候，第一年,一位研究教授对我们说：“事实是这样的，如果有一个东西你无法测量，那么它就不存在。”我心想他只是在哄哄我们这些小孩子吧。我说：“真的么?”他说：“这是理所当然的。”

你知道我有一个社会工作的学士文凭，一个社会工作的硕士文凭，我当时在读的是一个社会工作的博士文凭，所以我整个学术生涯都被人所包围，他们大抵相信生活是一团乱麻，接受它。而我的观点则倾向于，生活是一团乱麻，解开它，把它整理好，再归类放入有条理的盒子里。

我当时认为我领悟到了我的方向，找到了我的工作，有能力自己去创一番事业。社会工作的一个重要特征是工作的环境是一团遭的不适环境。我当时想我就是要把这不适环境翻个底朝天，每科都拿到A。这就是我当时的信条。我当时真的是跃跃欲试。我想这就是我的职业生涯，因为我对乱成一团，难以处理的课题很感兴趣。我想要把它们弄清楚，我想要理解它们，我想进入那些我知道是重要的东西，把它们摸个透，然后用浅显易懂的方式呈献给每一个人。

当时我的起点是“人与人之间的连接关系”。这是因为当你从事了10年的社会工作，你必然会发现这种连接关系就是我们活着的原因。它赋予了我们生命的意义，就是这么简单。无论你跟谁交流，工作在社会执法领域的也好，负责精神健康、虐待和疏于看管领域的也好，我们所知道的是，这种连接关系是一种感应的能力，生物神经上的，我们就是这么被设定的，这就是为什么我们在这里。

所以我就从连接关系开始。下面这个场景我们是再熟悉不过了，你的上司给你作工作评估，她告诉了你在37件事上你做得相当棒，但还有一点，有可以进一步提高的空间?然后你满脑子都想着那一点提高的空间，不是么?这也是我当时研究的课题，因为当你跟人们谈论爱情时，他们告诉你的是一件让他们心碎的事;当你跟人们谈论归属感时，他们告诉你的是最让他们痛心地被排斥的经历;当你跟人们谈论人与人的连接关系时，他们跟我讲的是如何被断绝关系的故事。

所以很快，在大约开始研究这个课题6周以后，我遇到了一个前所未闻的东西，它以一种我不理解也从没见过的方式，揭示了人与人之间的连接关系。所以我暂停了原先的研究计划，我对自己说，我得弄清楚这东西到底是什么。它最终被鉴定为耻辱感。

耻辱感这个词很容易理解，即害怕被断绝关系。如果一些关于自己的事被别人知道了或看到了，别人会认为自己是不值得交往的人?我要告诉你们的是：这种现象很普遍;我们都会有这种想法。没有体验过耻辱的人是不会对人产生对爱的向往或希望建立关系。没人想谈论自己的糗事，你谈论的越少，你越感到可耻。滋生耻辱感的是一种“我不够好”的心态，我们都知道这是个什么滋味：“我不够什么：我不够苗条，不够有钱，不够漂亮，不够聪明，职位不够高。” 而支撑这种心态的是一种刻骨铭心的脆弱，而克服这一脆弱感的关键在于要有人与人之间的连系，我们必须让自己被看见，真真切切地被看见。

你知道我怎么看待脆弱?我恨它。所以我思考着，这次是轮到我用我的标尺击溃它的时候了。我要闯进去，把它弄清楚，我要花一年的时间，彻底瓦解耻辱，我要搞清楚脆弱是怎么运作的，然后我要智取胜过它。所以我准备好了，非常兴奋。跟你预计的一样，结果事与愿违。你们知道这个(结果)。

我现在能告诉你关于耻辱的很多东西，但那样我就得占用别人的时间了。但我在这儿可以告诉你，归根到底，这也许是我在从事研究的数十年中学到的最重要的东西。我当时预计的一年变成了六年，我搜集到成千上万的故事，成千上百个采访，焦点集中。有时人们发给我定期报道，发给我他们的故事，不计其数的数据，所有这些都发生在这六年的时间。通过这些数据，我大概掌握了它。

我以为我理解了耻辱，它的运作方式。我于是写了一本书，我出版了一个理论，但我总觉得哪里不对劲，这么来说吧，如果我粗略地把我采访过的人分析一下，他们可以分成两种，一种是具有自我价值感的人，说到底就是自我价值感，他们勇于去爱并且拥有强烈的归属感;另一部分则是为之苦苦挣扎的人，总是怀疑自己是否足够好的人。

区分那些敢于去爱并拥有强烈归属感的人和那些为之而苦苦挣扎的人的变量只有一个。那就是，那些敢于去爱并拥有强烈归属感的人相信他们值得被爱，值得享有归属感。就这么简单。他们相信自己的价值。而对于我来说，最困难的一点是有一种东西使得人们对这种关系感到恐惧，他们认为他们不值得有这种爱和归宿感的关系，无论从个人，还是职业上我都觉得我有必要去更深入地了解这个秘诀。所以接下来我找出所有的采访记录，找出那些体现自我价值的，那些持有这种观念的记录，集中研究它们。第一群人有什么共同之处?我对办公用品有点痴迷，但这是另一个话题了。我拿起一个牛皮纸文件夹，还有一个三福记号笔，我心想，我该怎么给这项研究命名呢?第一个蹦入我脑子的是全心专注这个词。这是一群全心专注、靠着一种强烈的自我价值感在生活的人们。所以我在牛皮纸夹的上端正地写上这个词，而后我开始查看数据。

事实上，我开始用了四天时间集中分析数据，我从头翻出那些采访，找出其中的故事和事件：主题是什么?有什么规律?我丈夫带着孩子离开了小镇，因为我老是陷入像杰克逊.波洛克(美国近代抽象派画家)似的疯狂状态，我一直在写，完全沉浸在研究的状态中。

下面是我的发现：这些人的共同之处在于有勇气。我想在这里先花片刻跟大家区分一下勇气和胆量。勇气，最初的定义，当它刚出现在英文里的时候，词源来自从拉丁文的cor，意思为心，是由此演变过来的，其最初的定义是真心地叙述一个故事，告诉大家你是谁的。

所以这些人就具有勇气承认自己不完美。他们具有爱心，先是对自己的，再是对他人的。因为，事实就是这样：我们如果不能善待自己，我们也无法善待他人。最后一点，他们都能和他人建立关系，这是很难做到的，前提是他们必须坦诚，他们愿意放弃自己设定的那个理想的自我以换取真正的自我，这是赢得关系的必要条件。他们还有另外一个共同之处：他们欣然接受脆弱。他们相信，让他们变得脆弱的东西也会让他们变得美丽。他们不认为脆弱是一种容易的事，但也不认为脆弱是一种钻心的疼痛，这应验了我之前在关于耻辱的采访中听到的。他们只是简单地认为脆弱是必须的。在采访中他们谈到，他们愿意先说出“我爱你”;愿意做那些具有风险性的事情;在做完乳房X光检查之后，他们有勇气等待医生的电话结果;无论有没有结果，他们愿意为关系情感投资。他们觉得这些都是最根本的。

我当时认为那是自欺欺人。我无法相信我尽然对科研的方式曾宣誓效忠，研究的定义是控制(变量)然后预测，去研究现象，为了一个明确的目标，进行控制并预测。而我当时这一通过控制与预测方式进行的科研任务，却出现了这样一个结果：要想与脆弱共存就得停止控制，停止预测，于是我崩溃了。

我称它为崩溃，我的心理医生称它为灵魂的觉醒。灵魂的觉醒当然比精神崩溃要好听得多，但我跟你说那的确是一种精神崩溃。然后我不得不暂且把数据放一边，去求助心理医生。让我告诉你：你很清楚知道你自己是谁，当你打电话跟你朋友说：“我觉得我需要跟人好好谈谈。你有什么好的建议吗?”

我大约有五个朋友这么回答：“喔!我可不想当你的心理医生。”我说：“你是什么意思?”他们说：“我只是想说，别带上你的标尺鞭子来见我。”我说：“行。”就这样我找到了一个心理医生，她叫黛安娜。我跟她的第一次见面时，我带去了一份表单，这些人都是那些全身心投入生活的生活方式，见到黛安娜，我坐下了。她说：“你好吗?”我说：“我很好。还不赖。”她说：“发生了什么事?” 这是一个治疗心理医生的心理医生，我们不得不去看这些心理医生，因为他们的废话测量仪很准(知道你什么时候在说真心话)。我说：“事情是这样的。我很纠结。”她说：“你纠结什么?”我说：“嗯，我跟脆弱过不去。事实上，我知道脆弱是耻辱和恐惧的根源，是我们为自我价值而挣扎的根源。但它同时又是欢乐、创造性、归属感、爱的源泉。所以我觉得我有困惑，我需要帮助指导。”我补充道：“但是，这跟家庭无关，没有童年那些乱七八糟的事”。“我只是需要一些策略”，我接着说，。戴安娜的反应是这样的，(她学着医生那样，慢慢地点着头)。我接着说：“这很糟糕，对么?”她说：“这不算好，但也不算坏”。“事情本身就是这样”， 她接着说。我说：“哦!我的天，事情全要更为混乱了!”

纠缠不清的事果然发生了，但又没有发生。大概有一年的时间。你知道的，有些人当他们发现脆弱和温柔很是重要的时候，他们放下所有戒备，欣然接受。我要声明，一，这不是我，二，我朋友里面也没有这样的人。对我来说，那是长达一年的斗争。是场激烈的混战，脆弱打我一拳，我又还击它一拳。最后我输了，但我或许赢回了我的生活。

然后我再度投入到了我的研究中，又花了几年时间真正试图去理解那些全身心投入生活的人，他们做了怎样的决定?他们是如何应对脆弱的?为什么我们为之痛苦挣扎?我是独自在跟脆弱斗争吗?不是。这是我学到的：我们对脆弱开始麻痹了，(例如)当我们等待(医生)电话的时候。好笑的是，我在Twitter微博和Facebook上发布了一条信息：“你怎样定义脆弱?什么会让你感到脆弱?”在一个半小时内，我收到了150条回复。因为我想知道大家都是怎么想的。

当时我不得不请求丈夫帮忙，因为我病了，而且我们刚结婚。跟丈夫提出要做爱;跟妻子提出要做爱;被拒绝;约某人出来;等待医生的答复;被裁员;裁掉别人，这就是我们生活的世界。我们活在一个脆弱的世界里。

我们应对的方法之一是麻痹脆弱。我觉得这不是没有依据，这也不是依据存在的唯一理由。我认为我们当代问题的一大部分都可以归咎于它。在美国历史上，我们是欠债最多、肥胖、毒瘾、用药最为严重的一代。问题是，我从研究中认识到，你无法选择性地麻痹感情。你不能说，这些是不好的。这是脆弱，这是悲哀，这是耻辱，这是恐惧，这是失望，我不想要这些情感。我要去喝几瓶啤酒，吃个香蕉坚果松饼。我不想要这些情感。我知道台下传来的是会意的笑声。别忘了，我是靠“入侵”你们的生活过日子的。天哪，我的上帝.你无法只麻痹那些痛苦的情感而不麻痹所有的感官，所有的情感。你无法有选择性地去麻痹。当我们麻痹那些(消极的情感)，我们也麻痹了欢乐，麻痹了感恩，麻痹了幸福。然后我们会变得痛不欲生，我们继而寻找生命的意义，然后我们感到脆弱，然后我们喝几瓶啤酒，吃个香蕉坚果松饼。危险的循环就这样这形成了。我们需要思考的一件事是我们是为什么、怎么样麻痹自己的?这不一定是指吸毒。我们麻痹自己的另一个方式是把不确定的事变得确定。宗教已经从一种信仰、一种对不可知的相信变成了确定。我是对的，你是错的。闭嘴。就是这样。只要是确定的就是好的。我们越是害怕，我们就越脆弱，然后我们变得愈加害怕，这件就是当今政治的现状。探讨已经不复存在。对话已经荡然无存。有的仅仅是指责。你知道研究领域是如何描述指责的吗?一种发泄痛苦与不快的方式。

我们追求完美。如果有人想这样塑造他的生活，那个人就是我，但这行不通。因为我们做的只是把屁股上的赘肉挪到我们的脸上。这真是，我希望一百年以后，当人们回过头来会不禁感叹：“哇!”这是最危险的，我们想要我们的孩子变得完美。让我告诉你我们是如何看待孩子的。从他们出生的那刻起，他们就注定要挣扎。当你把这些完美的宝宝抱在怀里的时候，我们的任务不是说：“看看她，她完美的无可挑剔”。而是确保她保持完美：保证她五年级的时候可以进网球队，七年级的时候稳进耶鲁。那不是我们的任务!我们的任务是注视着她，对她说，“你知道吗?你并不完美，你注定要奋斗，但你值得被爱，值得享有归属感”，这才是我们的职责。让我看来，用这种方式培养出来的一代孩子，我保证我们今天所有的问题会得到解决。

我们假装我们的行为不会影响他人。不仅在我们个人生活中我们这么做，在公司中也一样：无论是提供紧急资助避免公司倒闭，石油泄漏事故，还是有疵产品的召回。我们假装我们做的事对他人不会造成什么大影响。我想对这些公司说：嘿，这不是我们第一次牛仔式的野蛮竞技。我们只要你坦诚地，真心地说一句：“对不起，我们会很好处理这个问题”。

但还有一种方法，我把它留给你们。这是我的心得：卸下我们的面具，让我们被看见，深入地被看见，即便是脆弱的一面;不管有多大的风险，全心全意地去爱，这是最困难的。

我也可以告诉你，我作为一名孩子的父母，这个非常非常困难的：带着一颗感恩的心，保持快乐，哪怕是在最恐惧的时候，哪怕我们怀疑：“我能不能爱得这么深?我能不能如此热情地相信这份感情?我能不能如此矢志不渝?”在消极的时候能够扛得住，而不是一味地幻想事情会如何变得更糟。对自己说：“我已经很感恩了，因为能感受到这种脆弱，这意味着我还活着。”

最后，还有最重要的一点，那就是相信我们已经做得够好了。因为我相信当我们在一个让人觉得“我已经足够了”的环境中打拼的时候，我们会停止抱怨，开始倾听，我们会对周围的人会更友善，更温和，对自己也会更友善，更温和。

这就是我演讲的全部内容。谢谢大家。

第二篇：TED演讲：成功的秘诀

成功的钥匙

When I was 27 years old, I left a very demanding job in management consulting, for a job that was even more demanding: teaching. I went to teach seventh grades math in the New York City public schools. And like any teacher, I made quizzes and tests, i gave out homework assignments. When the work came back, I calculated grades. What struck me was that I.Q. was not the only difference between my best and my worst students, some of my strongest performers did not have stratospheric I.Q. Scores, some of my smartest kids weren’t doing so well. And that got me thinking, the kinds of things you need to learn in seventh grade math, sure, they’re hard: ratios, decimals, the area of a parallelogram, but these concepts are not impossible. And I was firmly convinced that every one of my students could learn material if they worked hard and long enough。

在我27岁的时候，我辞去了一份非常有挑战性的职业-企业管理咨询，转而投入了一份更加具有挑战性的职业：教育。我来到纽约的一些公立学校教七年级学生数学，和别的老师一样，我会给同学们做小测试和考试，我会给他们布置家庭作业。当这些试卷和作业收上来之后，我计算了他们的成绩，让我震惊的是，I.Q的高低并不是我最好的和最差的学生之间唯一的差别，一些在课业上表现很好的学生并不具有非常高的IQ分数， 一些聪明的孩子反而在课业上表现的不那么尽如人意，这引起了我的思考。当然，学生们在七年级需要学习的东西，是有难度的，像比率，小数，平行四边形的面积计算，但是这些概念是完全可以掌握的，我坚信我的每一位学生都可以学会教材内容，只要他们肯花时间和精力的话。

After several more years of teaching, I came to the conclusion that what we need in education is a much better understanding of students and learning from a motivational perspective, from a psychological perspective. In education, the one thing we know how to measure best is I.Q., but what if doing well in school and in life, depends on much more than your ability to learn quickly and easily? So I left classroom, and I went to graduate school to become a psychologist. I started studying kids and adults in all kinds of super challenging settings, and in every study my question was who is successful here and why. My research team and I went to West Point Military Academy, we try to predict which cadets would stay in military training and which would drop out. We went to the National Spelling Bee, and tried to predict which children would advance farthest in competition. We studied rookie teachers in really tough neighborhoods, asking which teachers are still going to be here in teaching by the end of the school year. And of those, who will be the most effective at improving learning outcomes for their students. We partnered with private companies, asking which of these salespeople is going to keep their jobs, and who’s going to earn the most money? 经过几年教学之后，我得出一个结论，我们在教育方面需要做的是从学习动力的角度和心理学的角度对学生和学习行为，进行一次更为深刻的理解。在教育系统中，我们都知道评价优秀学生的标准就是IQ，但如果在学校和生活中的优秀表现远不仅仅依赖于你轻松高效的学习能力呢?所以我离开了讲台，回到学校继续心理学硕士学位。我开始研究，孩子和大人在各种具有挑战性的情况下以及在各项研究中，我的问题是谁才是成功者，为什么他们会成功?我和我的研究团队前往西点军校展开调研，我们试图预测哪些学员能够耐得住军队的训练，哪些会被淘汰出局。我们前去观摩全国拼字比赛，同时也试着预测哪些孩子会晋级到最后的比赛。我们研究，在恶劣的环境下工作的，刚入行的老师，询问他们哪些老师会在学年结束后继续留下来任教。以及他们之中谁能最快地提高学生的学习成绩。我们与私企合作，向他们询问哪些销售人员可以保住工作，哪些赚钱更多?

In all those very different contexts, one characteristic emerged, as a significant predictor of success, and it wasn’t social intelligence, it wasn’t good looks, physical health, and it wasn’t I.Q., it was grit. Grit is passion and perseverance for very long-term goals. Grit is having stamina, grit is sticking with your future, day in, day out. Not just for the week, not just for the month, but for years and working really hard to make that future a reality. Grit is living life like it’s a marathon, not a sprint. A few years ago, I started studying grit in the Chicago public schools. I asked thousands of high school junior to take grit questionnaires, and then waited around more than a year to see who would graduate, turns out that grittier kids were significantly more likely to graduate, even when I matched them on every characteristic I could measure, things like family incomes, standardized achievement test scores, even how safe kids felt when they were at school. So it’s not just at West Point or the National Spelling Bee that grit matters, it’s also in school, especially for kids at risk for dropping out. To me, the most shocking thing about grit is how little we know, how little science knows about building it. 在所有那些不同的环境下，一种性格特征凸显了出来，这种特征很大程度上预示了成功，而且他并不是社交智力，不是漂亮的外表，强健的体魄，也不是很高的I.Q.，它是毅力。毅力是对长远目标的激情和坚持，毅力是拥有持久的恒劲，毅力是你对未来的坚持，日复一日，不是仅仅持续一个星期或者一个月，而是几年甚至几十年努力奋斗着，让自己的梦想变为现实。毅力把生活当成一场马拉松而不是一场短跑。几年前，在芝加哥的公立学校里开始研究毅力，我对上千名初中生进行了关于毅力的问卷调查，然后等候了一年多来看最终哪些学生能毕业结果证明那些更具毅力的学生在毕业的概率上占绝对优势，即使是在同样可以量化的外在因素下，像家庭收入，标准化成绩测验的分数，甚至是孩子们在学校能获得多少安全感之类，仍是有毅力的学生更容易毕业，所有不仅仅是在西点军校里或者全国拼字比赛上才需要毅力，在学校亦是如此，尤其是对于那些徘徊在辍学边缘的孩子们。对我来说，关于毅力最让我震惊的事情莫过于对于毅力，我们知之甚少，在培养毅力上，科学对理解的认识又是何等贫乏。

Every day, parents and teachers ask me “how do i build grit in kids?” What do I do to teach kids a solid work ethic, how do i keep them motivated for the long run? The honest answer is, I don’t know. What I do know is that talent doesn’t make you gritty. Our data show very clearly that there are many talented individuals who simply do not follow through on their commitments. In fact, in our data, grit is usually unrelated, or even inversely related to measure of talent. So far, the best idea I’ve heard about building grit in kids is something called “growth mindset”. This is an idea developed at Stanford University by Carol Dweck, and it is the belief that the ability to learn is not fixed, that it can change with your effort , Dr. Dweck has shown that when kids read and learn about the brain and how it changes and grows in response to challenge, they’re much more likely to persevere when they fail, because they don’t believe that failure is a permanent condition. So growth mindset is a great idea for building grit, but we need more, and that’s where I’m going to end my remarks, because that’s where we are, that’s the work that stands before us.We need to take our best ideas, our strongest intuitions, and we need to test them. We need to measure whether we’ve been successful, and we have to be willing to fail, to be wrong, to start over again with lessons learned. In other words, we need to be gritty about getting our kids grittier. Thank you!

每天都有家长和老师来问我“我怎样做才能培养孩子的毅力呢”该做些什么才能教授给孩子们真正的职业道德，我又该怎样调动他们长期的积极性呢?老实说，我不知道。我所知道的是，才华并不能使你坚韧不拔，我们的数据十分清楚的表明，有许多才华横溢的人，他们都无法坚持兑现自己的承诺。事实上，根据我们的数据来看，毅力通常与其他因素无关，甚至与才华的衡量标准背道而驰。到目前为止，我所听说过得在孩子身上培养坚忍品质最有效的方法，叫“成长型思维模式”。斯坦福大学卡洛杜威克提出过一个观点，他相信人的学习能力是可变的，他随着你的努力程度而变化。杜威克教授表示，当孩子们阅读和学习有关大脑的知识，以及它在面对挑战时所发生的变化和成长情况，他们失败之后更容易坚持下去，因为他们不相信一直失败下去，因此，成长性思维模式对培养毅力大有裨益。但是我们需要更多，我决定在次结束我的评论，因为我们正在经历这一切，这是眼前所面临的工作，我们要拿出最好的想法和最强的直觉。我们要对他们进行实践，我们需要估量这一切是否成功，同时还要渴望面对失败和错误，要从这些失败中汲取教训经验重新再来，换句话说，我们只有自己变得更加有毅力才能让我们的孩子变得更有毅力，谢谢大家。

第三篇：TED演讲——内向性格的力量

When I was 9 years old, I went off to summer camp for the first time. And my mother packed me a suitcase full of books, which to me seemed like a perfectly natural thing to do, because in my family, reading was the primary group activity. And this might sound antisocial to you, but for us it was really just a different way of being social. You have

about camp spirit and said we should all work very hard to be outgoing. And so I put my books away, back in their suitcase, and I put them under my bed, and there they stayed for the rest of the summer. And I felt kind of guilty about this. I felt as if the books needed me somehow, and they are calling out to me and I was forsaking them, but I did forsake them and I didn‟t open that suitcase again until I was back home with my family at the end of the summer.

Now, I tell you this story about summer camp. I could have told you 50 other just like it, all the time that I got the message that somehow my quiet and introverted style of being was not necessarily the right way to go, that I should be trying to pass as more of an extrovert. And I always sensed deep down that this was wrong and that introverts were pretty excellent just as they were, but for years I denied this intuition, and so I become a Wall Street lawyer, of all things, instead of the writer that I had always longed to be, partly because I needed to prove myself that I could be bold and assertive too. And I was always going off to crowded bars when I really would have preferred to just have a nice dinner with friends. And I made these self-negating choices so reflexively, that I wasn‟t even aware that I was making them. Now this is what many introverts do, and it‟s our loss for sure, but it is also our colleagues‟ loss and our communities‟ loss. And at the risk of sounding grandiose, it is the

world‟s loss, because when it comes to creativity and to leadership, we need introverts doing what they do best. A third to a half of the population is introverts, a third to a half. So that‟s one out of every two or three people you know. So even if you‟re an extrovert yourself, you know I‟ talking about your coworkers and your spouses and your children and the person sitting next to you right now, all of them subject to this bias that is pretty deep and real in our society. We all internalize it from a very early age without even having a language for what we‟re doing.

Now to see the bias clearly you need to understand what introversion is. And it‟s different from being shy. Shyness is about fear of social judgment. Introversion is more about, how do you respond to stimulation, including social stimulation. So extroverts really crave large amounts of stimulation, whereas introverts feel at their most alive and their most switched on and their most capable when they‟re in quiet, more low-key environments. Not all the time, you know these things aren‟t absolute, but a lot of the time.

So the key then to maximizing our talents is for us all to put ourselves in the zone of stimulation that is right for us. But now here‟s where the bias comes in. Our most important institutions, our schools and our workplaces, they are designed mostly for extroverts, and for extroverts‟ need for lots of stimulation. And also we are living through this belief system. We have this belief system right now that I call the new groupthink, which

holds that all creativity and all productivity come from a very oddly gregarious place.

So if you picture the typical classroom nowadays: When I was going to school, we sat in rows. You know, we sat in rows of desks like this, and we did most of our work pretty autonomously, but nowadays, your typical classroom has pods of desks, four or five or six or seven kids all facing each other. And kids are working in countless group assignments. Even in subjects like math and creative writing, which you think, would depend on solo flights of thought. Kids are now expected to act as committee members. And for the kids who prefer to go off by themselves or just to work alone, those kids are seen as outliers often, or worse, as problem cases. And the vast majority of teachers‟ reports believing that the ideal student is an extrovert as opposed to an introvert, even though introverts actually get better grades and are more knowledgeable, according to research.

Okay, same thing is true in our workplaces. We now, most of us work in open plan offices, without walls, where we are subject to the constant noise and gaze of our coworkers. And when it comes to leadership, introverts are routinely passed over for leadership positions, even though introverts tend to be very careful, much less likely to take outsize risks, which is something we might all favor nowadays. And interesting research by Adam Grant at the Wharton School has found that introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes than extroverts do, because when they are managing proactive employees, they‟re much more

likely to let those employees run with their ideas, whereas an extrovert can, quite unwittingly, get so excited about things that they‟re putting their own stamp on things, and other people‟s ideas might not as easily then bubble up to the surface.

Now in fact, some of our transformative leaders in history have been introverts. I‟ll give you some examples. Eleanor Roosevelt, Rosa Parks, Gandhi, all these people described themselves as quiet and soft-spoken and even shy. And they all took the spotlight, even though every bone in their bodies was telling them not to. And this turns out to have a special power all its own, because people could feel these leaders were at the helm, not because they enjoyed directing others and not out of the pleasure of being looked at. They were there because they had no choice; because they were driven to do what they thought was right.

Now I think at this point it‟s important for me to say that I actually love extroverts. I always like to say some of my best friends are extrovert including my beloved husband. And we all fall at different points, of course, along the introvert/extrovert spectrum.

Even Carl Jung, the psychologist who first popularized these terms, said that there‟s no such thing as a pure introvert or a pure extrovert. He said that such a man would be in a lunatic asylum, if he existed at all. And some people fall smack in the middle of the introvert/extrovert spectrum, and we call these people ambiverts.

And I often think that they have the best of all worlds, but many of us do recognize

ourselves as one type or the other. And what I‟m saying is that culturally we need a much better balance. We need more of a yin and yang between these two types. This is especially important when it comes to creativity and to productivity, because when psychologists look at the lives of the most creative people, what they find are people who are very good at exchanging ideas and advancing ideas, but also have a serious streak of introversion in them. And this is because solitude is a crucial ingredient often to creativity.

So Darwin, he took long walks alone in the woods and emphatically turned down dinner party invitations.

Theodor Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss, he dreamed up many of his amazing creations in a lonely bell tower office that he had in the back of his house in La Jolla, California. And he was actually afraid to meet the young children who read his books for fear that they were expecting him this kind of jolly Santa Claus-like figure and would be disappointed with his more reserved persona.

Steve Wozniak invented the first Apple computer sitting alone in his cubical in Hewlett-Packard where he was working at the time. And he says that he never would have become such an expert in the first place had he not been too introverted to leave the house when he was growing up. Now of course, this does not mean that we should all stop collaborating, and case in

point is Steve Wozniak famously coming together with Steve Jobs to start Apple Computer, but it does mean that solitude matters and that for some people it is the air that they breathe. And in the fact, we have known for centuries about the transcendent power of solitude. It‟s only recently that we‟ve strangely begun to forget it. If you look at most of the world‟s major religions, you will find seekers, Moses, Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad, seeders who are going off by themselves alone to the wilderness where they then have profound epiphanies and revelations that they then bring back to the rest of the community. So no wildness, no revelations.

This is no surprise though if you look at the insights of contemporary psychology. It turns out that we can‟t even be in a group of people without instinctively mirroring, mimicking their opinions. Even about seemingly personal and visceral things like which you‟re attracted to, you will start aping the beliefs of the people around you without even realizing that that‟s what you‟re doing. And groups famously follow the opinions of the most dominant or charismatic person in the room, even though there‟s zero correlation between being the best talker and having the best ideas, I mean zero. So……

You might be following the person with the best ideas, but you might not. And do you really want to leave it up to chance? Much better for everybody to go off by themselves, generate their own ideas freed from the distortions of group dynamics, and then come

together as a team to talk them through in a well-managed environment and take it from there.

Now if all this is true, then why are we getting it so wrong? Why are we setting up our schools this way and our workplaces? And why are we making these introverts feel so guilty about wanting to just go off by themselves some of the time?

One answer lies deep in our cultural history. Western societies, and in particular the U.S., have always favored the man of action over the man of contemplation and “man” of contemplation, but in America‟s early days, we lived in what historians call a culture of character, where we still, at that point, valued people for their inner selves and their moral rectitude. And if you look at the self-help books from this era, they all had titles with things like “Character, the Grandest Thing in the World.” And they featured role models like Abraham Lincoln who was praised for being modest and unassuming. Ralph Waldo Emerson called him” A man who does not offend by superiority.”

But then we hit the 20th century and we entered a new culture that historians call the culture of personality. What happened is we had evolved an agricultural economy to a world of big business. And so suddenly people are moving from small towns to the cities. And instead of working alongside people they‟ve known all their lives, now they are having to prove themselves in a crowd of strangers. So, quite understandably, qualities like magnetism

and charisma suddenly come to seem really important. And sure enough, the self-help books change to meet these new needs and they start to have names like “how to win friends and influence people”. And they feature as their role models really great salesmen. So that‟s the world we„re living in today. That‟s our cultural inheritance.

Now none of this is to say that social skills are unimportant, and I‟m also not calling for the abolishing of teamwork at all. The same religions who send their sages off to lonely mountain tops also teach us love and trust. And the problems that we are facing today in fields like science and in economics are so vast and so complex that we are going to need armies of people coming together to solve them working together. But I am saying that the more freedom that we give introverts to be themselves, the more likely that they are to come up with their own unique solutions to these problems.

So now I‟d like to share with you what‟s in my suitcase today. Guess what? Books. I have a suitcase full of books. Here‟s Margaret Atwood, “Cat‟s Eye.” Here‟s a novel by Milan Kundera. And here‟s” the guide for the perplexed” by Maimonides.

But these are not exactly my books. I brought these books with me because they were written by my grandfather‟s favorite authors.

My grandfather was a rabbi and he was a widower, who lived alone in a small apartment in Brooklyn that was my favorite place in the world when I was growing up,

partly because it was filled with his very gentle, very courtly presence and partly because it was filled with books. I mean literally every table; every chair in his apartment had yielded its original function to now serve as a surface for swaying stacks of books. Just like the rest of my family, my grandfather‟s favorite thing to do in the whole world was to read. But he also loved his congregation, and you could feel this love in the sermons that he gave every week for the 62 years that he was a rabbi. He would take the fruits of each week‟s reading and he would weave these intricate tapestries of ancient and humanist thought. And people would come from all over to hear him speak.

But here‟s the thing about my grandfather. Underneath this ceremonial role, he was really modest and really introverted, so much so that when he delivered these sermons, he had trouble making eye contact with the very same congregation that he had been speaking to for 62 years. And even away from the podium, when you called him to say hello, he would often end the conversation prematurely for fear that he was taking up too much of your time. But when he died at the age of 94, the police had to close down the streets of his neighborhood to accommodate the crowd of people who came out to mourn him.

And so these days I try to learn from my grand father‟s example in my own way. So I just published a book about introversion, and it took me about 7 years to write. And for me, that seven years was like total bliss, because I was reading, I was writing, I was

thinking, I was researching. It was my version of my grandfather‟s hours of the day alone in his library.

But now all of a sudden my job is very different, and my job is to be out here talking about it, talking about introversion. And that‟s a lot harder for me, because as honored as I am to be here with all of you right now, this is not my natural milieu. So I prepared for moments like these as best I could. I spent the last year practicing public speaking every chance I could get. And I call this my “year of speaking dangerously.” And that actually helped a lot.

But I‟ll tell you, what helps even more is my sense, my belief, my hope that when it comes to our attitudes to introversion and to quiet and to solitude, we truly are poised on the brink on dramatic change. I mean, we are. And so I am going to leave you now with three calls for action for those who share this vision.

No.1, stop the madness for constant group works. Just stop it. And I want to be clear about what I‟m saying, because I deeply believe our offices should be encouraging casual, chatty café-style types of interactions, you know, the kind where people come together and serendipitously have an exchange of ideas. That is great. It‟s great for introverts and it‟s great for extroverts. But we need much more privacy and much more freedom and much more autonomy at work. School, same thing. We need to be teaching kids to work together, for sure,

but we also need to be teaching them how to work on their own. This is especially important for extroverted children too. They need to work on their own because that is where deep thought comes from in part.

Okay, no.2, go to the wilderness. Be like Buddha, have your own revelations. I‟m not saying that we all have to now go off and build our own cabins in the woods and never talk to each other again, but I am saying that we could all stand to unplug and get inside our own heads a little more often.

No.3, take a good look at what‟s inside your own suitcase and why you put it there. So extroverts, maybe your suitcases are also full of books. Or maybe they‟re full of champagne glasses or skydiving equipment. Whatever it is, I hope you take these things out every chance you get and grace us with your energy and your joy. But introverts, you being you, you probably have the impulse to guard very carefully what‟s inside your own suitcase. And that‟s okay. But occasionally, just occasionally, I hope you will open up your suitcases for other people to see, because the world needs you and in needs the things you carry.

So I wish you the best of all possible journeys and the courage to speak softly. Thank you very much.

第四篇：Ted语言的力量演讲稿2020[范文模版]

语言是文化战争中最基本的武器。这就像是我们的步枪，我们每一人都拥有，我们可以用它去塑造一个中国的形象。一起来看看Ted语言的力量演讲稿2020，欢迎查阅!

Ted语言的力量演讲稿1

放学回家，我把比大秤砣还重的书包放在沙发上，就开始写作业，刚写了五六个字，肚子就叫得比喇叭都要响。于是我就跑到厨房里，向妈妈讨口饭吃。忽然想起了老师留的三句话，就赶紧对妈妈说了。

我说了第一句：“妈妈，您辛苦了!”刚说完，妈妈就回敬我一句：“你缺心眼呀，没看见我正在做菜吗?”看来这句话不好使，我再来说第二句话。于是我又说：“妈妈，您歇会儿吧!”可妈妈又说：“你是不是喝了迷魂汤了，没看见我正在忙着呢吗?我歇了，你吃什么，难道你还能吃草呀?”看来这句话还不行，我还得把第三句话给用上，我就对妈妈说：“那妈妈，我来帮您吧!”“你可得了吧，你做的菜比臭豆腐还难吃，赶快去写作业吧!”

唉，说了这么多，妈妈连个笑脸都没有，反而被浇了一盆凉水，要不是老师留了这三句话的作业，我才不讨这没趣呢。妈妈肯定是忙坏了，才对我的关心漠然处之。妈妈的话也真够打击人的了，这样的话以后还要不要再说呢?不知道。

这使我想起了聋青蛙的故事。那个故事发生在一个大土坑里。两只青蛙掉进了深坑，怎么也跳不出来，其它的青蛙都劝它们，不要费力气了，出不来的。其中一只倒地死去，可另一只青蛙是聋子，以为它们在鼓励它，就一直跳，最后它终于跳了出来。

这让我知道了语言的力量是多么神奇!不要吝啬你的赞美之辞，感激之情，把它说出来，这个世界会更美丽。

Ted语言的力量演讲稿2

大家好!我是来自某年某班的某某，今天我演讲的题目是《语言的力量》。

古语有云“沉默是金”，但在我的眼里，沉默是铁。

我曾看过一篇文章，讲的是一个刚步入社会的青年由于总是秉承“多干少说”的观念做事，不去展露自己的才能，导致失去了一个很重要的机会。这个故事不正是我们大多数人的真实写照吗?语言，一定要表达出来，才能发挥它的力量。更何况，我们生活在一个信息如此发达的时代，不去表达怎么行呢?

时代在变，人自然也要紧随其后。人们总说“眼睛是心灵的窗户”，那么同样也可以说：语言是智慧的殿堂。若是将这些观点引入历史之中，不也有很多鲜活的例子吗?例如，妇嬬皆知的诸葛亮舌战群儒、墨子劝楚、晏子使楚……

我们不能说任何语言都是好的，因为总有那么一些人云亦云的语言，可是也有那么多好的语言供我作文https://Www.ZuoWEn8.Com/们学习品鉴，难道不是?

语言往往是促进社会发展的一大推力。人类刚诞生时，“集体”这个概念对他们来说，是可有可无。但人类的众多分支里，智人却凭借着“讲八卦”的能力，形成了比其他人类分支更为庞大的集体，并最终凭借这项能力消灭了其他人类分支，称霸地球。

可能有人会问，凭什么说是语言的力量让他们统治地球的?

我可以这样回答你：语言的最初作用就是凝聚人心。在其他人类分支还忙于狩猎采集时，我们的祖先就凭借着一时的奇思妙想，学会了其他人类分支还未学到的“讲八卦”，这也是他们能成功聚在一起的重要原因之一。

语言是最甘甜的琼浆，是最珍贵的宝藏，同时也是这个世上最美的赞歌。语言的力量，永远是智慧殿堂里最强大的武器。让我们学好语言，正确运用语言的强大力量吧!

谢谢大家，我的演讲完毕!

Ted语言的力量演讲稿3

希特勒曾经说过：“推动历史发展的只有两种力量，宗教的力量和语言的力量。”

语言的力量!他自己就是一个语言家，正是他的言语将他推上了至高无上的政治王座。变得无比疯狂，强大。再回想我国古代，战国时期，七国争霸，那些纵横于政治舞台之上，活跃于各国之间，最终留名青史的人，不也都是靠着一条三寸不烂之舌吗?语言的力量，推动历史的力量!

中国人越来越爱说朝鲜人民的笑话了，越来越爱说这个致力于让人民吃上米饭的国家的笑话了，这个住着世界上最幸福的人民的国家。

朝鲜人民说：“这个世界上，我们是最幸福!”

朝鲜人来到了中国探亲，忽遇一农家小院，遂入，发现地上有一铁碗，里面盛满了白米饭，还有一些肉片，想不起自己是在多少年前吃过这样的饭了，她异常感动，“中国人民其实真幸福!”正当这时，这家的草狗跑进来，或论好听一点中国田园犬，回来吃饭了，而饭就是地上那碗……

又记一朝鲜官员来到中国考察，西装革履，十分体面，中国人民当然也十分好客，夜夜都是五星级，待他走了，中国人傻了眼，五星级宾馆，被洗劫空了……

记得我们小学老师论过：“去朝鲜，就可以有大富翁的感觉……”

虽然事实十分残酷，但中国人这样不好，幸灾乐祸，更何况自己也好不到哪里去，最后还伤害了人家民族自尊心。

又想起了那句“这世界上，我们最幸福”的口号，但这一次，它却是如此的空洞，飘渺，微弱。朝鲜人民万岁，共产主义万岁!

语言，是事实的表现，是时代批评者的利剑，事实家的武器。但当其与事实不负，甚至相互矛盾时，他的力量终究也只是一时的，强大却稍纵即逝。

回首历史，强大的德意志终是灰飞烟灭，希特勒死于残垣断壁之中，六国虽在说客的舌下联合抗秦，但最终还是为强秦所征服。语言家所创造出的历史，最终还是被历史大潮所湮灭。

这就是语言的力量，所谓创造历史的力量，卖弄它的小丑们呀!终会为历史所唾弃。

Ted语言的力量演讲稿4

我家邻居刘老师，人称刘老，他自称刘姥姥。54岁那年，他从教学第一线退下来，决定去私立学校打工，以实现旅游兼考察的计划。

一天，刘姥姥打开电脑，在网上寻找用人单位，选中一家，他便发去一封长信，全面介绍自己。从本科毕业到教研组长，从年年获奖到15年任教高三毕业班，洋洋洒洒千余字，他把信投入信箱，像发出请柬，专等客人的到来。可是等来的是不快：对方问他是不是特级教师，他像受到了污辱，便不再搭理人家。

第二天，刘姥姥继续寻思招聘的事。打开电脑，读着昨天的信，他笑了，平庸，没一点特色，还语文教师呢。在言不由衷的吹嘘随处可见的时代，你诚恳之至，甚至脱得光光，一丝不挂地站到别人面前，未必就能得到他的信任;相反只给他一个朦胧的背影，说不定他会追着要见你呢。于是，他将长信浓缩成一组

数字排比：“有一位高中语文教师，54岁年龄，44岁精力，34岁抱负，24岁饭量，没有特级教师的光环，但有特别骄人的业绩，愿借贵校平台施展自己的教学才华，不知赏识否?”他把短信发给一所学校，说来也巧，第二天，校长就打来电话，让他前去应试。

在这所学校干了一年，刘姥姥又带着特制的名片去拜访另一所学校。他赶到该校，负责人不在，只有招生部一位女士在班。他说明来意，女士断然回绝：“学校不缺语文教师。”刘姥姥掏出名片，女士接过一看，一组数字呈现在她的眼前：55岁年龄，45岁精力，35岁抱负，25岁饭量。女士看罢数字，脸上多云转晴，笑着说：“刘老师真会说话。”刘姥姥说：“说和写是语文教师的专长，如果能和你同事，一定与你好好切磋说和写问题。”女士一改先前的态度：“刘老师，我一定向校长推荐你。”几天后，刘姥姥接到了这所学校的电话，排比句又一次征服了招聘单位。

两年后，刘姥姥想去北京闯荡。一家高考复习班招聘语文教师，言明只招中青年教师。刘姥姥相信自己的实力，更相信语言的力量，再一次改动排比句，把它编进电子邮件：“刘某某，男，57岁年龄，47岁精力，37岁抱负，27岁饭量，没有特级教师的光环，但有特别骄人的业绩，你给我一个平台，我还你一个惊喜。”排比句再次发生效力，校长电话邀请，很快在北京见面。

有人崇拜权力，权力是一种力量，其实语言又何尝不是一种力量呢!刘姥姥今年58，明年59，相信他还会用他智慧的语言赢得更多的信任和尊重，在人生舞台上演出更精彩的节目。

Ted语言的力量演讲稿5

每当打开博客网页，总是先看看自己上一次发表的文章题目后面是否挂上了个“精”字，如果有个“精”字，总是心花怒放，手舞足蹈。明明知道自己的文章怎么也拿不上大雅之堂，何谈得上是精品文章，老师给个好的评价，也只不过是对自己的鼓励和鞭策罢了。然而，为什么如此在乎，如此兴奋，想了好久，还是难以用几句话准确无误地表达出来。几年前我的邻居李老师给我讲的发生在他的同事身上的故事对我表达或者很有帮助。

下面就听听这个故事吧。

李老师的同事姓王，对书法很是兴趣，经常利用课余时间练笔，不少同学经常围拢在他身边，耳濡目染，自然影响了很多学生。学生自发成立了一个书法兴趣小组，请王老师予以指导。由于是初中学生，而且是没有任何门槛的自愿参加，因此水平低、参差不齐是在所难免了。一次，一个学习成绩平平的男孩很拘禁的将自己的习作递给了王老师，王老师仔细端详了好几遍怎么也找不出什么优点，笔画似锯齿，结构不严禁，但是王老师微微一笑用“不错，竖直，横平”的言语进行鼓励。过了几天，这个男孩又捧着自己的习作来到王老师的面前，显然这次大方多了，王老师看了看他的习作，又评价到：“不错，笔划匀称，结构也较严紧”。两年过去了，在毕业那年，这个男孩不但成了一个书法特招生，而且在他所考取的学校中专业课成绩第一名。男孩捧着特招通知书，向王老师道谢，王老师依然是那一句的“不错……”

看着这个男孩，学校的老师、家长不禁感慨万千。语言力量如此之大，如果第一次王老师看到他的习作后，指三道四，这也不行，那也不该，横挑鼻子竖挑眼，也就少了一个书法爱好者，也就少了一个书法专业特招生，多了一个家庭思想包袱，因为凭他的学习成绩说什么也不会升入高的一级学校深造。这就是为人师的艺术，以宽容之心，以长远的目光，发现和培养学生兴趣，循循善诱，培养学生身上每一个闪光点，静静等待百炼成钢的那一天。

故事结束了。听这个故事的你是否和我一样的想法：我们这里的老师也是这样，因为他们知道，老师的一句温馨的话语，一点小小的鼓励，对于我们也许是一辈子的文字情缘。

Ted语言的力量演讲稿2020

第五篇：TED演讲成功的两大秘诀

一 前期准备工作

当我想到要做一个扣人心弦的演讲，在我脑海中浮现的是去带着观众踏上一段旅途。 1.做好提纲

除非你有值得一说的东西，不然你就做不了一个好的演讲。而对你想说的内容进行提炼和建立结构是准备过程中最重要的部分。 2.讲一个故事

我们都知道人们很喜欢听故事，而那些最引人入胜的叙述结构中都有着大量的隐喻。当我想到要做一个扣人心弦的演讲，在我脑海中浮现的是去带着观众踏上一段旅途。一个成功的演讲是一个小小的奇迹，人们由此看到不同的世界。

如果你把故事当作一段旅途，最重要的便是找出从哪里开始、到哪里结束。想想观众们对你的故事可能已经有了哪些了解、他们有多关心它，以此找到合适的起点。

最棒的演讲者会非常快速地介绍主题，解释他们自己为什么会对这个话题感兴趣，并说服观众相信他们也应该关注这个主题。 3.突出重点

我在演讲者的初稿中发现的最大问题是会涵盖太多内容。你无法在一个演讲中去概括整个行业。如果你试图将你知道的所有东西都塞进演讲，那就没时间去举出关键的细节了，而且你的演讲会因各种抽象的语言而晦涩难懂，从而会导致本身就懂的人能听得懂，而之前不懂的人就不知所云了。

你需要举出具体的例子来使你的想法有血有肉，充实起来。

不要一心想把所有东西都纳入到一个短短的演讲。相反地，要深入。不要告诉我们你研究的整个领域，告诉我们你的独特贡献。

当然，过度阐述或者纠结于内容的意义也不可行。对这种情况有另一套补救的方法。记住，观众们很聪明。让他们自己去找寻出一些意义，去各自归纳收获的结论。 4.营造悬念

很多顶级的演讲具有着侦探小说般的叙事结构，演讲者引出问题开始演讲，然后介绍寻求解决方法的过程，直到恍然大悟的一刻，这时观众自会看到这一切叙述的意义。

如果一个演讲失败了，几乎都是因为讲者没有设计好整个故事，错误估计了观众的兴趣点，或者忽略了故事本身。即使话题再重要，没有足够的叙述作为铺垫，反而偶然冒出一些武断的意见总会让人感到不爽。没有一个递进的过程，就不会感到自己有所收获。

二 想好演讲方式

我认为最简单且实用的方法就是上台前做一下深呼吸。 1.最受欢迎的演讲都是背好了讲

一旦你想好怎么说故事了，就可以开始重点考虑具体的演讲方式。发表一个演讲有三个主要的途径：

1、照着手稿或提词器直接读;

2、记下演讲提纲来提示你要讲的具体内容;

3、记住全部内容。

我的建议是：别照着读，也别使用提词器。一旦被人们看出来你在照着读，观众们的注意力就会转移。突然你就与观众变得疏远。

我们很多最受欢迎的TED演讲都是逐字逐句完全记下来的。如果你有充裕的时间做这样的准备，这其实就是最好的演讲方式。 2.使用亲切的谈话式语气

有些讲者倾向于较为权威、装逼、强硬或热切的语气，可是谈话式的语气会听上去更令人舒服。

如果成功的演讲是一次旅途，那就不要在过程中惹恼你的旅伴。有些讲者表现得太过于自我。他们表现得非常优越、人生成功而圆满，但观众们就会感到无语。千万别这样。

3.减少下半身的移动

就那些毫无经验的演讲者而言，肢体表现是演讲中最难的一部分，不过人们却会太容易高估它的作用。用对措辞、说好故事、以及演讲的内容要比你站姿如何、看起来是否紧张更大程度地决定演讲能否成功。对台风而言，一定程度上的训练就有很大帮助。

我们在早期排练时候发现的最常见的错误，是人们会过于频繁地移动身体。他们会晃来晃去，或者把重心在两腿间不停移动。如此容易分散观众的注意力。其实，只要减少下半身的移动就可大大提高台风。 4.把握眼神交流

在台上最关键的肢体语言或许应该是眼神交流。在观众席里找五六位看起来顺眼的，演讲时用眼神和她们交流，把他们当成你很久没见的老朋友，想象你正把他们带进你的工作中来。这样的眼神交流相当有效，它比其他任何方法都要对你的演讲有帮助。即使你没有充足的时间做好准备，必须得照着稿子读，那么抬起头做一些眼神上的交流会让一切变得不同。 5.如何面对紧张

对无经验的演讲者而言，另一个大挑战就是紧张，不同人应对紧张有不同的处理方法。很多讲者在演讲前会呆在观众席中，这方法很有效，因为听前面的演讲者演讲可以转移注意力并减少紧张。

我认为最简单且实用的方法就是上台前做一下深呼吸。真心有效。

就算不能完全克服紧张，也没关系，观众们其实也预料得到你会紧张。紧张能使你表现得更好：它给予你表现的力量，并保持你思维敏捷。稳住呼吸，一切都没问题的!

甚至，承认紧张也可以带来魅力。大胆展示出你的脆弱，无论是紧张亦或是你的语音语调，只要是实在的，都是赢得观众倾心的有力武器。在2012年TED大会上演讲的苏珊·凯恩就特怕做演讲。你可以感觉到她在台上时的脆弱，这种感受让观众都为她加油—所有人在结束后都想拥抱她。努力使她美丽，也使她的演讲成为当年最受欢迎的一个。

6.恰当采用多媒体技术

现在为我们所用的多媒体技术数不胜数，所以觉得怎么也得用幻灯片吧，什么都不用都觉得对有点不起观众。现在大多数人都知道PPT的诀窍：保持简洁;不要把幻灯片做成演讲稿(就好比列出你所要讲的每一点—这些最好写在你手中的小卡片里);不要把幻灯片上的内容原封不动地大声念出来。

许多顶尖的TED演讲者不用幻灯片，而且很多演讲内容也不需要它。如果你要用到视频，那么，把它剪辑得足够短—如果长于1分钟，你就有可能失去观众了。还有，任何带配乐的视频都可能会让人倒胃口。而且无论如何，别放你自己被电视台采访的视频。我曾看过有演讲者这么做，而且真不怎么样—没人会想要了解你的自大。观众已经在你面前听你现场演讲了，为什么还要同时让他们到看你出现在新闻采访的特写镜头中呢?